Tennis News

From around the world

Indian Wells: Kristina Mladenovic beats Caroline Wozniacki to reach semi-finals

  • Posted: Mar 16, 2017

France’s Kristina Mladenovic beat former champion Caroline Wozniacki to reach the Indian Wells semi-finals and break into the world’s top 20.

The fast-improving 23-year-old, seeded 28th, saw off 2011 winner and 13th seed Wozniacki 3-6 7-6 (7-4) 6-2.

Mladenovic next faces American Venus Williams or Russia’s Elena Vesnina.

Spain’s Pablo Carreno Busta saved two match points to beat Uruguay’s Pablo Cuevas 6-1 3-6 7-6 (7-4) and become the first man into the semi-finals.

Busta, the 21st seed, will face the winner of the match between Switzerland’s third seed Stan Wawrinka and Austrian eighth seed Dominic Thiem.

Mladenovic added Wozniacki to seven-time Grand Slam champion Venus Williams, world number three Karolina Pliskova and, earlier this week, fourth seed Simona Halep on the list of leading names she has beaten in 2017.

She began her quarter-final slowly, falling 5-1 down against Wozniacki, who was in form herself after recent finals in Doha and Dubai, and had won all three of their previous matches.

But the Frenchwoman showed why her singles game is beginning to match the level that sees her currently ranked third in doubles.

Her more powerful game began to dominate Wozniacki and, after edging the second set in a tie-break, Mladenovic raced way with the decider as the Dane struggled with an ankle problem.

“I was very frustrated with the beginning of the match,” said Mladenovic, who won her first WTA title in St Petersburg earlier this year.

“I was hitting a lot of unforced errors and you can’t do that against a top player like Caroline.

“I felt like I had to adjust to this huge court. It feels different to play out here after hiding out on the small courts. I just tried to stay positive and fight like always.”

Source link

Wawrinka, Thiem, Carreno Busta, Cuevas Eye Indian Wells QF Spots

  • Posted: Mar 16, 2017

Wawrinka, Thiem, Carreno Busta, Cuevas Eye Indian Wells QF Spots

Top half of the draw compete in last eight action on Thursday

• Top 10 players and Top 2 Pablos will battle in the BNP Paribas Open quarter-finals on Thursday when No. 3 seed Stan Wawrinka meets No. 8 seed Dominic Thiem and No. 21 seed Pablo Carreno Busta faces No. 27 seed Pablo Cuevas. Three of the four boast one-handed backhands (Wawrinka, Thiem and Cuevas) and all four are bidding for their first Indian Wells semi-final.

Watch Live

• Wawrinka rallied Wednesday after lucky loser Yoshihito Nishioka served for their fourth-round match twice. The top-ranked Swiss owns a 2-1 FedEx ATP Head 2 Head record against Thiem. He is 0-2 in Indian Wells quarter-finals, falling to Novak Djokovic in 2008 and Roger Federer in 2011. Wawrinka has reached as many ATP World Tour Masters 1000 finals as Grand Slam finals (three).

• Thiem has not played Wawrinka since breaking into the Top 35 of the Emirates ATP Rankings on May 25, 2015. The Rio de Janeiro champion is already appearing in his eighth tournament of the season, spanning six countries, four continents and three surfaces. Thiem is 17-6 in 2017, tied with Jo-Wilfried Tsonga and Grigor Dimitrov for the most wins on the ATP World Tour this season.

• Carreno Busta, who lost to Thiem in the Rio de Janeiro final, has played even more tennis than the Austrian this season (14-6 singles, 12-4 doubles). The 25-year-old is No. 23 in singles and No. 19 in doubles — good for the second-highest combined ranking on tour behind Jack Sock (18s, 17d). Carreno Busta reached the quarter-finals following a bye, a walkover and two wins over qualifiers.

• Cuevas defeated Carreno Busta en route to the Sao Paulo title, which he won on Monday, March 6 at 7:36 pm local time following multiple rain delays. The Uruguayan started the year 1-4, including a first-round loss to World No. 138 Arthur De Greef as defending champion at Rio de Janeiro. Cuevas is 7-0 since then, including his fourth-round win over De Greef’s countryman David Goffin.

• Carreno Busta and Cuevas share more than a name. They captured the Rio de Janeiro doubles title on February 25 after saving a match point against Jamie Murray and Bruno Soares in the semis. Thursday’s match is the biggest singles quarter-final of their respective careers. Carreno Busta and Cuevas are both appearing in their first ATP Masters 1000 or Grand Slam quarter-final.

• Fifteen of the Top 20 singles players in the Emirates ATP Rankings were in the BNP Paribas Open doubles draw. None reached the semi-finals, which begin on Thursday with No. 6 seeds Raven Klaasen and Rajeev Ram against Gilles Muller and Sam Querrey. Klaasen and Ram, the Delray Beach champions, eliminated Rafael Nadal in the second round and Djokovic in the quarter-finals.

Watch your favourite players work on their games by taking in a live stream at the BNP Paribas Open in Indian Wells.

View Indian Wells TV Schedule

Source link

My Masters 1000: Pablo Cuevas

  • Posted: Mar 16, 2017

My Masters 1000: Pablo Cuevas

Uruguayan reveals what makes playing in the ATP World Tour Masters 1000 series so special

Pablo Cuevas is no stranger to success at ATP World Tour Masters 1000 events. In 2015, he clinched the doubles title at the Internazionali BNL d’Italia. In 2016, the 31-year-old reached the singles fourth round at the Mutua Madrid Open.

The Uruguayan has advanced to his first singles ATP World Tour Masters 1000 quarter-final at the BNP Paribas Open in Indian Wells this week. Cuevas tells ATPWorldTour.com about his Masters 1000 favourites and dreams.

Which ATP World Tour Masters 1000 host city is your favourite and why?
I love Rome. I remember studying its history at school, with the mythology, the architecture, the city in general… And the club is really nice. When you walk around, with all those statues… The Pietrangeli court is one of the most beautiful ones on Tour.

Which Masters 1000 would you most want to win and why?
I had the honour to win Rome in 2015 in doubles [w/David Marrero], but if I had to pick one for singles, I would say probably one in Europe or the United States. However, all the Masters 1000 are the same in terms of importance so any one would be great.

What is your favourite off-court memory at a Masters 1000?
For me there is not one in particular, but I love the fact that loads of people come to watch tennis, especially in Indian Wells and Miami, the two places where you can also do a lot of off-court activities. I remember I went fishing once in Miami for an activity and that was great.

You May Also Like: My Masters 1000: Pablo Carreno Busta

What do you consider to be your best Masters 1000 win?
Miami, 2011. I beat Andy Roddick there in two sets [6-4, 7-6(4)].

What is your dream match at a Masters 1000 (who would you play & at which tournament)?
Well, to make it a dream match I should win. That’s a must. Then, the rival could be any of the Big Four, those four players who are making history in our sport: Rafa [Nadal], Roger [Federer], [Andy] Murray or [Novak] Djokovic. In any venue. Actually, an outdoor one.

Which player/champion would you consider to be the toughest competitor in Masters 1000 history?
It really depends on the surface but I would say Murray and Djokovic are the toughest ones on hard court and Rafa, (Stan) Wawrinka and also Djokovic on clay courts.

Which Masters 1000 tournament has the rowdiest fans?
Miami for sure. Although it’s true that we get a lot of support at every Masters 1000 and all the crowds are very respectful.

Source link

Nadal: 'I Didn't Have The Answer For His Returns'

  • Posted: Mar 16, 2017

Nadal: 'I Didn't Have The Answer For His Returns'

Spanish fifth seed turns focus to Miami Open after fourth-round defeat to Federer

When Roger Federer is blitzing backhands off the ground from the outset, Rafael Nadal knows he is going to have to be on his game. So when the three-time champion succumbed to his Swiss rival 6-2, 6-3 in little more than an hour at the BNP Paribas Open on Wednesday he admitted he did not come up with the answers when it mattered most.

Nadal will shift his focus to capturing an elusive Miami Open presented by Itau crown now, having finished runner-up in Florida four times. He leaves knowing what he has to do next time to break a three-match losing streak against Federer – the first time he has lost as many matches in succession in their 36th FedEx ATP Head2Head meeting.

I think it was always that he returned well. But at the same time, it was obvious that I didn’t have the right answer for his returns,” Nadal said. “I needed to neutralise the points. I needed to neutralise his two first balls, and I didn’t … I was not good enough tonight to make that happen and he deserved the victory, for sure.”

You May Also Like: Federer Stuns Nadal In Straight Sets

Nadal was only able to muster one break point opportunity in the match and it came after he dropped his opening service game. He was not able to break the 36 year old’s serve throughout.

“I need to hit longer and I need to hit higher to create problems [for him],” Nadal said. “I was not able to do that, and then he [had the] advantage.

“The worst thing in that match for me was from the beginning I was at a disadvantage – broken the first game of the match, and then broken in the second game of the second set. So that’s so difficult to play against Roger this way.”

 Watch Full Match Replays

 The 30 year old was determined not to dwell on the fourth-round defeat for long. “When you feel that you are playing bad or you are in a bad moment, maybe it stays a little bit longer in your mind,” he said. “It is not my case.

 I started the season great, playing great tennis, winning a lot of matches. Today I didn’t play my best, but I am really confident I’m going to play well in Miami [next] week.” 

Watch Live

Source link

Sharapova: Will the Russian's wildcard invites extend to Grand Slams?

  • Posted: Mar 16, 2017

Maria Sharapova will return from her doping ban in Stuttgart in six weeks time, but her participation at the French Open and Wimbledon remains in significant doubt.

The 29-year-old has been offered wildcards into the WTA tournaments in Stuttgart, Madrid and Rome. She will need another if she is to play at Roland Garros, and unless she makes a flying start when her career resumes, her presence at Wimbledon will be in the hands of the All England Club.

The reputation of the Grand Slams is linked intrinsically to the integrity of the sport. Will they take the view that once a ban is served, a decorated former champion like Sharapova should be entitled to unlimited invitations to the world’s best events? Or will they share the view of Andy Murray and Caroline Wozniacki that, after a doping ban, players should not be offered shortcuts into tournaments?

A former Grand Slam champion is currently free to accept as many wildcards as they wish, but that is a rule which is likely to be reviewed, according to the WTA’s chief executive. Steve Simon has also said – in an interview for BBC Sport in Los Angeles – that he is not personally in favour of changing the rule, as a doping ban “should not wipe out a career’s worth of work”.

Should a Grand Slam champion retain all privileges after a doping ban?

Murray believes that ideally a player should be made to work their way back after a ban by accumulating ranking points in smaller tournaments. Wozniacki was even more direct with her language when she addressed the subject here in Indian Wells.

“When someone has been banned for drugs and something that is performance enhancing, I think that you deserve a second chance like everybody else. People make mistakes, but I think you should fight your way back from the bottom,” the former world number one Wozniacki said.

Other players, like Venus Williams and Simona Halep, believe Sharapova is deserving of wildcards, but it may be that a Grand Slam champion who serves a doping ban loses the right to unlimited wildcards in the future.

“Every rule gets looked at and reviewed, and I’m sure this may be one of them,” WTA chief executive Simon told me.

“If the members wish us to look at the rule, we will – that’s how our system works.

“My personal opinion is that it shouldn’t be adjusted unless we decide to not provide it at all and change the entire wildcard rule. I think the suspension is in place to deal with an action that occurred – I don’t think it should wipe out a career’s worth of work, and in essence that’s what people are saying.

“Maria has served a 15 month suspension, has had no income, has lost all of her ranking as well as her Australian Open winnings from 2016 – so she’s served a significant penalty for her actions.”

Stuttgart wildcard has ruffled feathers

Sharapova will make her return in Stuttgart on Wednesday 26 April, which is the very day her ban expires and two days after the tournament begins. This has upset Angelique Kerber, the German who has won the title for the past two years and will return to the top of the world rankings on Monday.

Like Sharapova, she is sponsored by Porsche, the firm also sponsors the tournament, and she is unhappy the Russian has been granted a Wednesday start (although this is not without precedent) and a wildcard which could have been given to a German player. She described it as a “little strange”, although she is understood to have vented stronger feelings in private.

The French Open must make the next move

The organisers of the French Open have a big decision to make.

It will be too late for Sharapova to gain direct entry into the tournament. And to survive the cut for qualifying – which is made on 1 May – she would have to reach the final in Stuttgart. That would be a mighty achievement after 15 months out of the game, when faced with a field which includes eight of the world’s top 10.

The French player Jo-Wilfried Tsonga has said publicly he doesn’t think the French Tennis Federation should award Sharapova a wildcard and the initial comments of the new FFT president Bernard Giudicelli were not at all reassuring for Sharapova.

He told a meeting of the Roland Garros press commission – before he met Sharapova in California – that the tournament would prefer she returned when “completely rehabilitated”. He described integrity as one of their most important responsibilities and suggested it would be difficult to invite Sharapova at the same time as they have increased their funding for the fight against doping.

More on this story
Sharapova wildcard ‘disrespectful’ Sharapova to return from doping ban in April
Andy Murray says players banned for doping should not get wildcards Sharapova banned for two years

Will Sharapova be seen at Wimbledon this summer?

After the French Open, the surface turns to grass. There are tournaments in the Netherlands, in Mallorca, and then three on British soil in Nottingham, Birmingham and Eastbourne.

The LTA says it is yet to discuss or offer wildcards to anyone. Sharapova would need a wildcard to enter at least two, and almost certainly all three of the British events. Announcements tend to be made late on (it is always handy to have a card or two up your sleeve), by which time Sharapova may be committed elsewhere. Whatever the outcome, it seems unlikely the LTA will offer the five time Grand Slam champion a wildcard months in advance so they can use her presence as a marketing tool to drive ticket sales.

Which takes us to Wimbledon. Sharapova would probably need to reach a semi-final and a quarter-final from the three events she will play before the entry list is revealed to avoid having her fate determined by the All England Club’s tennis sub-committee.

If she does not have sufficient ranking points, then Tim Henman could prove to be a significant figure. Henman is not only a board member but also chairs this committee, which traditionally meets to discuss wildcards on the eve of the announcement, which is scheduled this year for Wednesday 21 June.

The All England Club aspires to the highest standards and last year announced increased anti-doping measures. My sense from several conversations is that a wildcard may not be offered to Sharapova, if she does indeed require one.

That still leaves one final scenario. If Sharapova does not make the main draw by right, she is quite likely to have enough ranking points to enter qualifying. These matches are staged at the Bank of England Sports Grounds in Roehampton, where the public can come and go as they please and media facilities are limited.

The grounds seem ill equipped to host Sharapova and all those her presence would attract, but I understand improvements are already high on the All England Club’s priority list, and that ticketed entry is one option under consideration.

Source link

Wildcard rules could be reviewed as Sharapova prepares to return

  • Posted: Mar 16, 2017

The rules on wildcards handed to players who have been suspended could be reviewed in the wake of Maria Sharapova’s return from a doping ban, says the head of women’s tennis.

But WTA chief Steve Simon says it would be unfair to “wipe out a career’s worth of work”, by changing the rules.

The Russian has been given wildcards to April’s Porsche Grand Prix and May’s tournaments in Madrid and Rome.

That move has been criticised by current players including Andy Murray.

If you are viewing this page on the BBC News app please visit the BBC Sport website to vote.

Vote

Five-time Grand Slam winner Sharapova will return on 26 April without a ranking after serving a 15-month suspension for testing positive for meldonium.

Ex-world number one Caroline Wozniacki said Sharapova’s wildcard entry to the Porsche Grand Prix in Stuttgart is “disrespectful” to other players.

The Stuttgart event starts two days before her doping ban ends and she will not be allowed to attend until the day of her match.

“Every rule gets looked at and reviewed, and I’m sure this may be one of them,” Simon told BBC Sport’s tennis correspondent Russell Fuller. “If the members wish us to look at the rule, we will, that’s how our system works.

“My personal opinion is that it shouldn’t be adjusted unless we decide to not provide it at all and change the entire wildcard rule. I think the suspension is in place to deal with an action that occurred.”

He added: “Maria has served a 15 month suspension, has had no income, has lost all of her ranking as well as her Australian Open winnings from 2016 – so she’s served a significant penalty for her actions.”

Analysis

By BBC tennis correspondent Russell Fuller

The reputation of the Grand Slams is linked intrinsically to the integrity of the sport. Will they take the view that once a ban is served, a decorated former champion like Sharapova should be entitled to unlimited invitations to the world’s best events? Or will they share the view of Andy Murray and Caroline Wozniacki that, after a doping ban, players should not be offered shortcuts into tournaments?

Read more

Source link