Federer defeats Wawrinka in Indian Wells 2017 Final
Roger Federer continued his stunning start to the year with a comfortable straight sets win over Stanislas Wawrinka…
Roger Federer continued his stunning start to the year with a comfortable straight sets win over Stanislas Wawrinka…
The extent of doping in amateur sport – revealed by a poll for the BBC – is a “concern”, says sports minister Tracey Crouch.
A BBC State of Sport investigation found more than a third (35%) of amateur sports people say they personally know someone who has doped.
Half said performance-enhancing substance use is “widespread” among those who play competitive sport.
Crouch said doping was “absolutely unacceptable in any level of sport”.
She added: “I think there is still more that sports governing bodies can do on this front, working alongside UK Anti-Doping, to help promote clean sport.”
The investigation into doping in UK amateur sport also found 8% of amateur sports people said they had taken steroids, while 49% thought performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) were “easily available” among people who play sports regularly.
Nicole Sapstead, chief executive of UK Anti-Doping (Ukad), the body responsible for protecting clean sport, had earlier described the figures as “incredibly alarming”.
She called for more resources to tackle doping, saying it was “fast becoming a crisis” at all levels of sport.
Crouch added: “These findings from the BBC are a concern.
“It is important that all involved in sport play their part in educating participants about the dangers of doping, both in terms of the damage it does to sport’s integrity but also the health risks to individuals as well.”
Ukad has an annual budget of about £7m, which is mainly state funding. A single drug test costs about £350.
Ukad directs the vast majority of its testing to elite sport and does not “have the resources” to test at lower levels of sport, says director of operations Pat Myhill.
He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme the research was “robust” and added: “We see lots of young people, young men in particular, who choose to use these substances for image enhancement, but this creeps across into sport as many of them will be involved in amateur sport.
“I don’t think it’s helpful to criminalise amateur sports people whatsoever – the way forward is to tackle the supply of these substances and take action against those who profit and make criminal money by supplying them.”
Michele Verroken, who ran the UK’s anti-doping organisation between 1986 and 2004, said she was concerned the BBC Sport research could be “turned into a plea for more money” for anti-doping, arguing testing is “quite limited in its effectiveness”.
“Do we want to extend testing down to an amateur level so we could actually be dissuading people from getting involved in sport?” she said on the Victoria Derbyshire programme.
“It would be inappropriate in a society where we have an obesity crisis and a concern with lack of physical activity that we suddenly start testing at an amateur level.
“We don’t know at elite level how much is enough. We tested Lance Armstrong and Marion Jones extensively and never tested them positive. We need smarter testing.”
American cyclist Armstrong, 45, was stripped of his record seven Tour de France titles and banned from sport for life in August 2012 for what the United States Anti-Doping Agency described as “the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping programme that sport has ever seen”.
Compatriot Jones, 41, won gold in the 100m and 200m at the 2000 Olympics but was sentenced to six months in prison in January 2008 for lying about steroid use and involvement in a drugs fraud case.
Kieran, 30, took steroids for a two-month period when he was an amateur bodybuilder and boxer about 10 years ago.
He says it caused extra male breast growth and is now recovering after breast-reduction surgery two weeks ago.
“I was naive, uneducated, and these tablets were going around the gym,” he told BBC Radio 5 live’s Your Call programme.
“In all honesty it was a cheat and something to get ahead of the other guys in the gym. I looked around the gym and the other guys were getting ahead of me and I wondered why. Peer pressure was one of the reasons I took them.
“The side-effects have been everlasting. It destroyed my life.
“Because I was putting so much testosterone in my body, my own oestrogen counteracted with it. I couldn’t wear certain clothes because, even though I was still training, no matter what I did exercise-wise I could not get rid of these male breasts.
“I went through living hell – the psychological effects were worse than the physical effects.”
An amateur cyclist, who also called the programme, described injecting performance-enhancing drugs.
“I know from within my team it was quite common,” he said. “It was talked about quite openly. It was just the way it worked. It’s what was done.
“I was in a whole world of trying to be a better cyclist. All the choices I was making in my life were about trying to be faster. I would do anything to be faster.”
Professor Ellis Cashmore, sociologist at Aston University, told BBC Breakfast he thinks doping should be made legal as “we will never rid sport of it”.
“You can test over and over again and you can punish violators but you cannot actually control doping,” he said.
“Anything that confers a competitive advantage, athletes will take.
“That leads me to the logical conclusion that maybe we should accept it, that it is part and parcel of modern sport and somehow monitor it to try to regulate it, but not penalise athletes who do dope.”
Have you ever taken a performance enhancing substance? Does your sport have a problem with doping? Get in touch using this link.
Only a brave pundit would have pencilled in Roger Federer as an early bolter atop the Emirates ATP Race to London just three months into the Swiss star’s comeback after a six-month lay-off. But after claiming the two biggest titles of the season to date, the 35 year old has already surpassed his own expectations for 2017.
Victory over compatriot Stan Wawrinka in Sunday’s BNP Paribas Open final marked his 25th ATP World Tour Masters 1000 title – his fifth in the Californian desert – and comes on the back of his shock Australian Open triumph in January. It will require a welcome rethink on goals for the year ahead.
“For me, the dream run continues,” Federer said. “I’m not as surprised as I was in Australia, but still this comes as a big, big surprise to me, nevertheless, to win here again and beating the players that I did and the way I did. I couldn’t be more happy.
“It’s an absolutely huge start to the year for me. Last year I didn’t win any titles. I don’t think I was in any finals except Brisbane. The change is dramatic, and it feels great.”
The Swiss will climb back to No. 6 in the Emirates ATP Rankings as he heads to the Miami Open presented by Itau. He stands to make up ground having missed the ATP Masters 1000 event last year and given two of his greatest rivals, World No. 1 Andy Murray and No. 2 Novak Djokovic, have withdrawn citing right elbow injuries.
“In November, December, when I realised things were going well, and we had a meeting about what the goals are for the season in terms of rankings, it’s really secondary, but we wanted to set some goals for the season, and the goal was to be Top 8 by after Wimbledon.
“So I’m there much, much faster … It’s great, but you definitely have to reassess your goals and see, where do you go from here? Because this was not part of the plan, to win Australia and Indian Wells, I can tell you that.”
The last time Federer won in Miami he defeated his coach Ivan Ljubicic in the 2006 final to defend his title from the year before. He completed the Indian Wells/Miami double in both years and is well aware the difficulty in achieving the feat, let alone 11 years later.
“I think now it’s really important for me to rest up, maximum,” he said. “I hope I can play as late as possible going to Miami. Then I will make the plan for the remainder of the season – especially for the clay – after Miami, and then see also what the goals are, because the goals are clearly changing after this dream start.
“I know how hard it is to win back-to-back Indian Wells and Miami titles. That’s why again I sort of go to Miami knowing it’s going to be really difficult.”
We look into five storylines that emerged during the season’s first Masters 1000 event
1. NEW CONTENDERS ARE EMERGING FOR NO. 1 RANKING
Andy Murray unseated Novak Djokovic this past October for the top spot in the Emirates ATP Rankings, but Roger Federer and Stan Wawrinka are showing they may challenge for the top spot this season.
While Djokovic and Murray have piles of Emirates ATP Rankings points to defend for the remainder of 2017, Federer has minimal points to defend during the clay-court swing and nothing in the second half of the year. He’s already established himself as the dominant player of 2017 by winning the first Grand Slam and first Masters 1000 title of the year. Meanwhile, Wawrinka’s early exits last year in Masters 1000 events seem to have been halted with his runner-up showing in Indian Wells. The reigning US Open champion has said his results aren’t consistent enough to challenge for the No. 1 ranking, but he has so far continued to make deep runs this year.
2. KYRGIOS IS THRIVING ON THE BIG STAGES
Fresh off a win over World No. 2 Djokovic at the Abierto Mexicano Telcel, Nick Kyrgios repeated the feat with another straight-sets victory in their fourth round clash at Indian Wells. The upset was especially noteworthy as it snapped the three-time defending champion’s dominance at this event.
The Aussie has always had the game to score big wins, but he’s shown improved discipline in his shot selection this season and appears better able to physically withstand the grueling rallies required to defeat the world’s best. The only thing that could stop Kyrgios this tournament was a bout of food poisoning that forced him to withdraw from his quarter-final against Roger Federer, but he should be healthy for Miami and keen for another big fortnight.
Despite the loss to Kyrgios, Djokovic enjoyed a milestone moment this tournament by recording the 300th ATP World Tour Masters 1000 win of his career over Juan Martin del Potro in the third round.
3. SOCK IS PRIMED FOR TOP 10 SPOT
Jack Sock continued his outstanding start to 2017 by reaching his first ATP World Tour Masters 1000 semi-final in Indian Wells, taking out Grigor Dimitrov in the third round and scoring his first Top 5 win against Kei Nishikori in the quarter-finals. The big-hitting American already has two titles this year in Auckland (d. Sousa) and Delray Beach (w/o Raonic), but proved he’s also ready to step up in the world’s biggest events.
An encouraging sign for Sock in his Top 10 quest is that he has also excelled on other surfaces, winning his first ATP World Tour title on the clay courts of Houston in 2015. If he can continue his current form throughout the remander of the year, he could be the first American to debut inside the Top 10 since John Isner in April 2012.
4. KEEP AN EYE ON THE QUALIFYING
From Vasek Pospisil’s mammoth second-round upset over Murray to the inspired fourth round run from Dusan Lajovic, several qualifiers at Indian Wells showed they have the games to avoid having to qualify for tournaments much longer. Even those who didn’t advance out of qualifying got in on the action, with lucky loser Yoshihito Nishioka defeating Ivo Karlovic and Tomas Berdych before narrowly falling to Wawrinka. This fortnight showed that qualifiers are far from mere draw filler and could produce plenty of major storylines throughout the season.
5. INDIAN WELLS GROUNDS CONTINUE TO IMPROVE
From a massive expansion of the Stadium Plaza, renovating all the suites and hospitality spaces, and adding 21 new restaurants and concessions, the major renovations unveiled this year delighted the 439,261 fans who streamed through the gates this year. With former World No. 2 Tommy Haas now at the helm as tournament director, it’s a guarantee that the fan experience at this tournament will get even better in the years to come.
The length of a rally tells you a lot about the personality and mindset of the player controlling it.
Roger Federer defeated Stan Wawrinka 6-4, 7-5 in the final of the BNP Paribas Open on Sunday by owning a very important slice of the match that most resembles the moves and countermoves of playing chess – the mid-length rallies of five to nine shots.
Shorter rallies are all about striking first with the serve and return. Long rallies are all about patience and wearing your opponent down, both physically and mentally. Mid-length rallies are a thinking man’s game. This is where shot combinations come into play, and where Federer clearly gained the ascendancy in the match.
2017 Indian Wells Final – Rally Length Points Won
0-4 Shots
• Wawrinka 38
• Federer 37
5-9 Shots
• Wawrinka 16
• Federer 30
10+ Shots
• Wawrinka 2
• Federer 4
Federer was a step ahead in the final when rallies required just three, four or sometimes a fifth shot hit by either player. These points are dominated by combinations, like a chess player making a move for the sole reason of forcing their opponent to counter with a move that is slightly less advantageous.
Federer dominated the mid-length rallies 30-16, often times playing deep first to extract a short ball, and then manoeuvring to the net to finish with a precision volley. In the opening set, Federer finally broke Wawrinka leading 5-4, converting the only break point seen by either player.
The scoreboard appeared close early on, but Federer’s dominant 12-4 first-set advantage in the mid-length rallies gave him the hidden advantage of momentum.
Federer Serve +1 Forehands
The beginning of Federer’s mid-length dominance was often set up with a serve that was immediately followed by a forehand. Overall, Federer hit a serve +1 forehand 67 per cent (24/33) of the time in the final, winning a higher percentage with this strategy than starting with a backhand as his first shot after the serve.
Serve +1 Winning Percentage
• Serve +1 Forehand = 16/24 (67%)
• Serve +1 Backhand = 5/9 (56%)
When Federer landed his first serve, he hit 82 per cent (14/17) serve +1 forehands, winning 57 per cent (8/14) of them. He won two of three starting with a backhand. When Federer started the point with a second serve, he won an extremely high 80 per cent (8/10) beginning the point with a serve +1 forehand, and broke even on the backhand wing, winning three of six.
Attacking The Net
Overall, Federer came to the net 22 times in the match, winning a very healthy 82 per cent. It was vintage Federer swarming forward, finishing with six backhand volley winners, three forehand volley winners, and two overhead winners.
Points Won At Net
• Approach & Volley = 13/15 (87%)
• Serve + Volley = 5/7 (71%)
The net was quite often the finishing point for Federer’s mid-length rally points, building with a serve +1 forehand combination, and then ending with a spectacular volley, or forcing a passing shot error from Wawrinka.
Baseline
Federer’s backhand stole the show at Indian Wells in the second week with impressive victories over Steve Johnson, Rafael Nadal and Jack Sock, and it was once again a strong performer in the final with eight winners, and only eight unforced errors.
But it was Federer’s forehand, with 12 winners and just six unforced errors, that paved the way to victory against Wawrinka. Wawrinka averaged hitting his groundstrokes harder in the final, averaging 120km/h to Federer’s 108km/h, but Federer ultimately proved superior building the point.
This is the first time Federer has won Indian Wells without dropping a set. Amazingly, he may never have hit his backhand as well as he did in the desert this week. Federer is not simply regaining his previous best form. At 35 years old, he is blazing a trail to a completely new level.
You might expect Stan Wawrinka to feel frustrated, maybe even upset. Here he is, 31 years old, tennis’ retirement age decades ago, and still playing some of the best tennis of his life. On Sunday, Wawrinka played in his fourth ATP World Tour Masters 1000 title match in Indian Wells.
Yet his friend and older countryman Roger Federer, who at 35, is four years older, is still finding ways to one-up Wawrinka for the game’s biggest trophies. On Sunday, Federer beat Wawrinka 6-4, 7-5 in the BNP Paribas Open final. Wawrinka, though, said he bears no angst against his long-time friend.
“No. From that side, I think it’s more positive. That means you can still play your best tennis at that age. So it’s something you can learn from, especially for me,” said Wawrinka, who turns 32 a week from Tuesday. “He’s just amazing. The way he’s playing is just so beautiful, it’s just so nice. Everything looks perfect. He’s moving amazingly well. He has amazing touch. He’s doing everything you can do on the tennis court.”
Just because Wawrinka can effuse positives about his countryman, though, doesn’t mean he’s satisified with the defeat. The Lausanne native fell to 3-20 against Federer in their FedEx ATP Head2Head series and 0-15 on hard courts.
“He’s still a tough player to play for me, for my game, because he’s playing quick. He makes you feel uncomfortable and he mixes it up a lot… It’s always challenging,” Wawrinka said.
But the final loss still marks a great accomplishment for Wawrinka. Years ago, you would have been hard-pressed to find someone who would have thought the 6-foot right-hander would meet Federer in a Masters 1000 final. As recently as 2012, Wawrinka’s Emirates ATP Ranking still sat outside the Top 20. That same year, Federer hauled home three Masters 1000 titles.
“I think to play a final against him in a Masters 1000 is something amazing for me. I wouldn’t have dreamed that a few years ago and now it’s the second we have played,” said Wawrinka, referring to their 2014 Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters final. “I won the first one. I lost today. For sure I’m disappointed, but it’s still a great week for me.”
Wawrinka’s previous best finish in the desert had been the quarter-finals in 2008 (l. to Djokovic) and 2011 (l. to Federer). “I’m really happy to be in the final here in Indian Wells. It’s still an amazing result for me,” Wawrinka said. “I always want more, and I’m going to try to do everything possible to be the winner next time, but I need to take what’s positive. That’s what I’m going to do for the next few weeks.”
Watch Full Match Replays
Drug use at every level of sport is “fast becoming a crisis” according to UK Anti-Doping – responding to a BBC poll into doping in amateur sport.
It found more than a third (35%) of amateur sports people say they personally know someone who has doped, and 8% said they had taken steroids.
Half believe performance enhancing substance use is “widespread” among those who play sport competitively.
Ukad chief Nicole Sapstead described the figures as “incredibly alarming”.
A BBC State of Sport investigation into doping in UK amateur sport also found that 49% thought performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) were “easily available” among people who play sports regularly.
According to figures from UK Anti-Doping (Ukad), the national body responsible for protecting clean sport, there are currently 52 athletes and coaches serving bans.
Of these, only 12% are professional sports men or women; 62% are amateurs, 21% are semi-professional, and 5% are coaches.
Of the 186 sanctions handed out across 22 separate sports by Ukad since it formed in 2009, 46% have been rugby union or league players – mainly at amateur and semi-professional levels.
Reacting to the ComRes poll for BBC Sport of more than 1,000 men and women who are members of sports clubs and teams, Sapstead said: “Certainly the figures as regards the prevalence of performance-enhancing substances at an amateur level are incredibly alarming.
“That said, it does confirm what UK Anti-Doping has long suspected and also seen through some of our intelligence-led testing.
“I don’t think any sport can say that they don’t have a problem at an amateur level.
“I think now is the time for everybody to sit up and acknowledge that this is a reality in every single sport and that you can’t just be washing your hands of it or hoping that someone else will address it.”
Sapstead also told BBC Sport:
Of the 79 people interviewed who had specifically taken anabolic steroids, 41% said improving performance was the main reason for taking them, followed by pain relief (40%) and improving how they look (34%).
However, when this is widened out to include those who admitted taking other performance-enhancing substances, boosting results was no longer the primary reason.
Only 25% of users overall claim they have taken substances with the intention of improving performance.
Over half say they were primarily used for pain relief, while 17% say they were used to improve looks.
“I think there are clearly a group of individuals seeking to enhance their performance by taking prohibited substances,” said Sapstead, “and then there are others who were taking these substances because they have a body image problem, or actually because they think it’s the done thing.”
Younger people are the main users of anabolic steroids in amateur sport, according to the poll for BBC Sport.
Among sports club members aged 18-34, 13% say they have taken steroids to support performance or recovery while playing. Not one interviewee aged 55 or over said they had used anabolic steroids.
However, users aged between 35 and 54 are significantly more likely than those aged 18-34 to say pain relief is among the main reasons they have used steroids or other sports supplements.
But there is hardly any difference in gender, with 9% of men admitted taking steroids, compared with 8% of women.
And 71% of all those polled said they would not know where to get hold of anabolic steroids.
Using steroids for image reasons is a “worrying” problem among young people in Wales, according to the nation’s social services and public health minister Rebecca Evans, who said in January: “It’s not just a problem in sport – it is a wider societal issue.”
The law |
---|
More than 50 types of anabolic steroids are banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada), the independent body responsible for the list of substances prohibited in sport. |
The possession of steroids, which are class C drugs, is not illegal under UK law as long as they are only for personal use. |
It is illegal, however, to supply them to other people. |
According to the poll, a wide range of substances – both legal and illegal – are taken by amateur sports men and women to support their performance or recovery.
Performance-enhancing substances can also include recreational drugs and prescribed medications:
We also asked people about other substances they consumed while playing sport, including: energy drinks (68% had), pain-relief gels (60%), over-the-counter anti-inflammatory medicines (59%) and protein shakes (46%).
Former amateur cyclist Dan Stevens was banned after refusing a test in 2014. He turned whistleblower but labelled Ukad’s handling of his information “a catastrophic failure”.
Responding to the BBC Sport poll, Stevens, 41, said: “I think it is widespread in all ranks. I think it is widespread in celebrity, I think it is widespread in the beauty industry; I think it is certainly widespread in the sports industry.
“I also think it is just a way of modern day life – we are living in a pharmacised world.”
Stevens said he took thyroxine and testosterone on prescription, and EPO out of “curiosity”.
“I’d always been a clean athlete and this situation happened to me when I was 39 years old. That was enough to see a huge, huge gain.
“But the real thing for me wasn’t really about racing – I didn’t do a lot of racing on these substances. The main thing was curiosity.
“I don’t think in the amateur ranks it is about winning. You’ve got a situation where someone is overweight, a little bit fat, need to lean down, get in shape. And they get in shape.
“They then get railroaded into doing a marathon or a long bike ride or some kind of competitive event and they improve their fitness levels again and they become a healthier individual and become more body conscious and more health-orientated.”
More than a third of people (36%) who report consuming recreational drugs to support their performance while playing amateur sport have also taken steroids.
Dr Lambros Lazuras, an assistant professor of social psychology at Sheffield Hallam University who studies doping behaviour, told BBC Sport that there is a “pill-taking culture” in amateur sport and general society, which can act as a “gateway” to stronger substances.
“There are people who engage in stacking practices, using as many as 10 substances at the same time,” he explained. “For these people, it’s not what they use anymore, it’s what they want to achieve.”
“The use of steroids, for example, has been associated with problems like heart disease, kidney failure and even sudden death,” said Dr Lazuras. “You’re not just cheating, you’re putting your life at risk.
“This is an emerging public health issue,” claimed Dr Lazuras. “You’re using substances that are meant to treat diseases, and you’re actually misusing them without any prescription.
“We push people into exercise because we want to promote the health benefits. We forget that people in most exercise settings might consider using substances.
“This is actually the dark side of exercise. You don’t care about your health anymore. You care about your performance and how you look to other people – or yourself.”
A British weightlifter who has served a doping ban told BBC Sport steroid abuse is rife at all levels in his sport and that the culture starts at amateur level.
“It begins in the gym,” the weightlifter, who wishes to remain anonymous, said. “In weightlifting it gets to the point where you’re not growing anymore. You can train, train, train and not get anywhere.
“Every weightlifter will take steroids. Some of them are taking light stuff and some of them are really heavily using steroids – it all depends how much money you have.
“Is it easy to buy bread in the shop? That’s how easy it is to get steroids in the UK.
“If you’re not taking steroids, basically you’re nowhere in the competition, you’re not going to get anywhere really.
“I’m really proud of how they fight steroids in England. But the problem is, why are England losing? England won’t cheat.
“I’ve been caught because I didn’t think that somebody would come to my house. I left taking steroids one month before competition and I never ever thought somebody would come to my house and test.”
“I can’t do something that I really love. Only because I’ve been cheating with steroids, come on. It’s like I killed somebody. I’m not even an Olympic sportsman.”
Lewis Conlin, 32, a publisher from Buckinghamshire, used a supplement containing the banned substance DMAA when he started weight-training in his early 20s.
DMAA is an amphetamine-derived substance banned from sale in the UK and named on Wada’s prohibited list.
It has been linked with high blood pressure, tightening of the chest, stroke, heart attacks and even death, according to the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency.
“In terms of the energy and focus that I got, it was the best pre-workout supplement I’d ever had,” Conlin, who was weight-training four or five days per week with friends, told BBC Sport.
“You felt invincible, you felt you could do anything, you were just completely zoned out. You’d stare at a weight and go and lift it. That was great. Afterwards wasn’t so great.
“About three hours later you would have a crash and you’d have a real comedown. I’d be depressed and I’d be ratty, happy just to keep myself in isolation and then later on that day I was getting chest pains.
“I would have trouble sleeping and would have heart palpitations – but that didn’t actually stop me from taking it the next day. The training I was doing was so high and so intense I just wanted to have that every day.
“Had I known at the time exactly what DMAA did to your blood pressure and your heart rate then there is no way I would have carried on taking it.”
More drug testing among amateur sports people is a “waste of time”, according to one amateur cyclist who received a two-year ban for missing a post-race drugs test.
It would cost too much money and detract from focusing on drug use in the professional ranks, he added.
“I don’t see the point at all,” said the Briton, who asked to remain anonymous.
“What effect is it going to have on anything, unless it is something like a national championship where people can move on in the professional ranks and actually earn a living from it? It is a problem then because you’re actually affecting people’s lives.
In my opinion more testing would be just a waste of time at low level sport
“How far do you go – do you want to test people for doing a fun run? It’s up to them if they want to do whatever they want to do, in my opinion,” he said.
“If you want to catch someone then catch the right people – like the people that win the Tour de France and get away with it.
“But then that’s too much politics and money involved. They would rather get someone that doesn’t mean anything because it is easy.”
Ukad has an annual budget of around £7m, mainly state funding. A single drug test costs around £350.
Ukad directs the vast majority of its testing to elite sport, with Sapstead saying: “I would love to able to address the issues that we see at an amateur level, but the reality is we just don’t have the resources to do that.
“I strongly believe a further investment needs to be paid from sport, whether that’s from a levy on ticket sales – some contribution into a greater integrity pot of money, that’s distributed not just to anti-doping, but anti-corruption bodies.
“Someone somewhere needs to put their hand in their pocket and their money where their mouth is, and start to help pay for us to do this job, and do it as effectively and efficiently as possible.
“Cheating impacts against the people you are competing against. So it doesn’t matter if you’re an Olympian, or a Paralympian, and it doesn’t matter if you don your trainers at a weekend for a fun run.
“Actually, you’re competing, and therefore it absolutely matters that everyone is toeing the line and playing a fair game.”
BBC Sport – using ComRes to conduct the poll – interviewed 1,025 British adults, who are members of sports clubs, teams or gyms, online, between 27 and 31 January 2017. The data was drawn from a nationally representative sample of British adults aged 18 or over and the full tables are available here.
All sports played by those interviewed are regulated by UK Anti-Doping, apart from gyms.
Have you ever taken a performance enhancing substance? Does your sport have a problem with doping? Get in touch using this link.