If you were expecting a tight Roland Garros quarter-final between 2009 titlist Roger Federer and 2015 champion Stan Wawrinka, that’s what you’ve got. Federer battled through a tension-filled third set to take a 7-6(4), 4-6, 7-6(5) lead against his Swiss countryman.

The third seed has struggled converting break points, winning just one of 11 in the match. But Federer has held his nerve in the tie-breaks, dropping only two combined service points in both of them to move to within one set of his first Roland Garros semi-final since 2012.

Federer leads the pair’s FedEx ATP Head2Head series 22-3, but he only holds a 4-3 advantage on clay. The last time the 37-year-old played this event was in 2015, when Wawrinka defeated him in the quarter-finals en route to lifting the trophy.

Few expected the culprit, but the blow was only the latest in what has become a decades-long struggle for the one-handed backhand.

Roger Federer, the player who has done more to promote the shot than anyone in the past 15 years, won’t have any of his four children learning the one-handed backhand. Federer, like thousands of parents and coaches, thinks kids should learn the two-handed version.

“It’s easier. It’s that simple,” he said.

The tide has certainly turned. For various reasons – It’s too hard. No one teaches it anymore – the one-handed backhand is seen far less often on the ATP Tour and on recreational courts all over the world. The beautiful throwback shot, long said to be on tennis’ endangered list and going the way of serve-and-volley and chip-and-charge tactics, is in trouble.

In May 1999, nearly half – 43 – of the Top 100 of the ATP Rankings used a one-hander. Ten years later, the number had fallen to 28, and this week, the number has nearly split in half, to 15. The current forebears of the shot – Federer, 37, Stan Wawrinka, 34, – who face off in the Roland Garros quarter-finals on Tuesday – and Richard Gasquet, 32 – will likely retire in the next five years.

The headline for a 2014 story on the topic in The New York Times Magazine summed up the shot’s status: “The Death of the One-Handed Backhand.”

To the surprise of most, however, it seems there will be a future for the shot on the ATP Tour. The next wave of talent, led by No. 4 Dominic Thiem and #NextGenATP stars Stefanos Tsitsipas of Greece and Denis Shapovalov of Canada, sport some of the flashiest and most powerful one-handers in tennis and embrace the shot’s unique beauty.

The trio learned the shot amidst the two-handed backhand revolution, either by choice or because of a strong recommendation, and they’ve become the future for one of the sport’s most beloved shots. Together, they should ensure the one-hander has a home on the ATP Tour for at least another decade to come.

“I think a double-hander is the way to go, but I hope it’s not a dying breed. I think it just looks nice, a one-handed backhand,” Federer said. “So it’s nice to see Denis also keeping that alive and same with Thiem and young guys coming up, that it’s still going. But I think we will always be outnumbered from this point moving forward. Unfortunately Bjorn Borg had too big of an impact on this game. He just doesn’t know it sometimes.”

One-Handed Backhands In The Top 100 Of The ATP Rankings*

*Based on 27 May 2019 ATP Rankings

Nearly everyone used a one-hander in the mid-1970s. But then came along the flashy Borg and Jimmy Connors, brandishing two-handed backhands and winning Grand Slam titles. Chris Evert served as a similar catalyst for the WTA.

“Those three players did the most to change the vision of people in the game and get them thinking differently about what made sense, about the benefits of the two-hander, the advantages of making that into a really offensive shot,” Steve Flink, a longtime tennis historian and journalist who was inducted into the International Tennis Hall of Fame in 2017, told ATPTour.com.

But it’s not as if the one-hander disappeared. John McEnroe and Ivan Lendl, among others, reached No. 1 in the ATP Rankings with a one-handed backhand, and Federer has helped it stay prominent during his 22-year career.

Tsitsipas and Shapovalov, who grew up watching and idolising Federer, have both used the shot since they were kids. Tsitsipas, 20, fully committed to the one-hander when he was nine.

“We are players that have a different style from usual, so I really like the one-handed backhand,” he said.

The left-handed Shapovalov started with a two-hander as a five-year-old, but naturally let go of the second hand as he hit balls off a cone with his parents watching.

“My father and my mother had a little bit of a conversation. They came back to me, and they told me, ‘Try to just release the one-hander’,” Shapovalov said. “From that day, I always had a one-hander.”

About 11 years ago, Brad Gilbert, the former coach of Andre Agassi, Andy Roddick and Andy Murray, among others, was asked to watch a video of an eight-year-old Canadian boy playing at a tournament.

“I said, ‘Jeez, the kid looks pretty talented, switch him to a two-handed backhand,’” Gilbert told ATPTour.com.

The boy was Shapovalov. Gilbert, however, was not the only one to recommend the change.

“A lot of people said, ‘You’re too young or too weak to have a one-hander. Maybe you should stick to two and switch,’” Shapovalov said. “For me, it was always natural, and I think it’s turned out to be a great weapon of mine.”

The shot, technically, is harder than the two-hander. Dr. Jack Groppel, co-founder of Johnson & Johnson’s Human Performance Institute and a former chairman of the National Sports Science Committee for the United States Tennis Association, dedicated his doctoral dissertation to the physiological difference between the two-hander and the one-hander.

The year was 1978, shortly after Borg and Connors introduced the two-hander to the world, and Groppel, a former collegiate tennis player who hit with a one-hander, was curious about the new shot.

He found that the two-handed backhand requires coordination between the legs, hips, trunk and arms, whereas the one-handed backhand requires togetherness from the legs, hips, trunk, upper arm, lower arm and hand.

“The two-handed backhand was, to put in layman’s terms, much easier to hit,” Groppel told ATPTour.com.

It’s the main reason why Thiem, Tsitsipas and Shapovalov are outliers, and why millions of kids have never attempted a one-hander: The two-handed backhand is easier.

Kids especially struggle with the one-hander when trying to hit balls over their shoulder, although a global emphasis on lighter racquets, low-compression balls and shorter nets for kids could help mitigate this problem.

“If we can have them pick up the game faster and get more involved faster using the two-hander, I am all for it,” said Groppel, who also coached collegiately at the University of Illinois and directed the player development program at Harry Hopman/Saddlebrook International Tennis.

Gilbert, who used a one-hander to reach No. 4 in the ATP Rankings, also prefers the two-hander for its versatility.

A player with a two-hander can use a one-hander – i.e. Novak Djokovic hitting a one-handed slice – but a player with a one-hander never hits a two-hander, even when it’d be beneficial, such as when trying to fight off heavy topspin balls above his shoulder.

Kids, however, can always switch, a fact Federer acknowledged.

“If they want to change later on, I will teach them that one. But I can’t teach them a double-hander as I can’t hit that one. So that’s somebody else’s job,” he said. “I think, also like with everything in life, you also have your own character. Some people decide to change it at eight, some at 14, some later, because they find it a good challenge.”

Pete Sampras switched at the age of 14, and Thiem switched when he was 11 at the urging of his boyhood coach Gunter Bresnik.

“For sure, there were moments where I had doubts about my one-handed backhand, but still, at the end it was the right choice,” Thiem said.

Both shots have their advantages, Gilbert said. The two-hander can be better for returning serves, high topspin balls and immediate success. But the one-hander lends itself to the one-handed slice, more power, more topspin and maybe more deception.

But who said it has to be one or the other? Gilbert is envisioning a future Top 5 player who uses both. The player would use a one-hander most of the time during rallies, but a two-hander when returning serves or for rally shots above his shoulder.

Having both shots would also give him the element of disguise. His opponents couldn’t constantly go back to the heavy topspin ball above his shoulder, like Rafael Nadal did so often to Federer on clay.

More From #RG19
Tsitsipas Reflects On Five-Hour Slugfest With Wawrinka
Wawrinka: ‘This Is Why I Came Back’
Roger’s Great Escape

“In the next 15 years, I feel like somebody’s going to have a two-handed backhand return, be able to play two and one and play a high level, Top 5 level,” Gilbert said.

The idea sounds good in theory, but convincing people, as Gilbert has found out, is another matter.

He’s been working with an eight-year-old boy who hits a one-hander because his father loves Federer. “His dad is a massive Fed fan, massive Fed fan,” Gilbert said.

The child can hit the one-hander pretty well, “when he’s completely set and the ball is at his waist level”.

But at tournaments, his opponents hit high balls and the child doesn’t want to back up and wait until the ball drops; he wants, at the age of eight years old, to hit the high backhand like he sees Federer do on TV.

“That’s a tough sleddin’ shot when you’re eight,” Gilbert said.

So Gilbert pitched his hybrid idea – hit the two-hander on service returns and for over the shoulder balls, and the one-hander on slices and most of the time during rallies.

His father, however, has spent too much time watching – but clearly not listening to – Federer.

“He kind of assessed what I said,” Gilbert said, “but he said, ‘No, Fed’s our guy. We’re going to copy Fed.’”

For Juan Martin del Potro, there is victory in defeat. Despite a four-set loss to Karen Khachanov in a bruising baseline slugfest in the Roland Garros fourth round Monday, the Argentine leaves Paris with pep in his step and a positive outlook for the second half of the season.

“I think that I had a beautiful tournament,” said the 2009 US Open champion, who laced up for just the fourth time this season. The eighth seed twice rallied from a set down, including in a gutsy five-set win over Japan’s Yoshihito Nishioka in the second round, and his right knee – which he fractured in a fall in Shanghai last October – successfully came through 16 tough sets on clay.

Although the current World No. 9 will slip outside the Top 10 of the ATP Rankings next Monday, he is thankful to be contemplating a return to grass rather than a return to rehab, which consumed a large part of his early season.

“I’m feeling well, beyond this defeat, which is pretty harsh,” said the 30-year-old former World No. 3. “As of tomorrow, we will be talking about my future tournaments, Queen’s, Wimbledon. And I think that we won’t think about rehabilitation or recovery after this week.”

Against Khachanov, Del Potro found himself in the unusual position of being outhit by the 23-year-old 6’ 6” powerhouse. The Russian clipped 58 winners to Del Potro’s 42 and made 13 fewer unforced errors (35 to 48).

“In the first set, the weather conditions were faster, and I took advantage of that,” Del Potro said. “So I had started better. But then it’s true that Karen has very good physical shape, and he’s able to load the ball, give a lot of power to it.

“In the third and fourth sets, on these errors that I made because of taking too many risks, he took advantage to be more solid in his game. And in these conditions, very few players can hit the ball so hard. Karen is one of these players, and he made me run a lot…

“I really played to the limit of my capabilities. That’s why I made errors.”

Did You Know?
Del Potro’s 22 match wins at Roland Garros are his most at any major except the US Open (35). He is a two-time semi-finalist in Paris (2018 & 2009).