Tennis News

From around the world

Social Media Reacts To Djokovic's Record 7th Australian Open Title

  • Posted: Jan 27, 2019

Social Media Reacts To Djokovic’s Record 7th Australian Open Title

Stars commend Djokovic on his victory at Melbourne Park

World No. 1 Novak Djokovic made history on Sunday, defeating Rafael Nadal in straight sets to win his record seventh Australian Open title. The Serbian previously shared the tournament record for most trophies with Roger Federer and Roy Emerson. It is also Djokovic’s 15th Grand Slam victory, passing Pete Sampras for third on the all-time list. Fellow players, athletes and others took to social media to congratulate the top seed on his triumph.

You May Also Like: Djokovic Masterclass Seals Record Seventh Australian Open Crown

Source link

Djokovic thrashes Nadal to win record seventh Australian Open title

  • Posted: Jan 27, 2019

Novak Djokovic won a record seventh Australian Open title and a third successive Grand Slam as he swept aside Rafael Nadal in Melbourne.

The Serb broke the Spaniard’s serve five times – and was rarely troubled on his own – in a 6-3 6-2 6-3 victory.

Second seed Nadal, 32, looked rattled by the world number one’s intensity and made 28 unforced errors.

Djokovic, 31, won in two hours and four minutes to move clear of six-time men’s winners Roy Emerson and Roger Federer.

A forehand winner down the line brought up two championship points, Djokovic taking the second when Nadal clubbed a backhand long.

Djokovic fell to his knees after sealing another triumph on Rod Laver Arena, smacking the court with both hands and screaming towards the sky.

The reigning Wimbledon and US Open champion claimed his 15th Grand Slam title, moving him outright third ahead of American Pete Sampras in the all-time list, closing in on Switzerland’s Federer (20) and Nadal (17).

Djokovic has now won 13 of his past 16 meetings with Nadal, who has not beaten the Serb on a hard court since the US Open final in 2013.

He leads 28-25 in their record 53 meetings between two male players.

Djokovic continued his fine record of going on to win the tournament every time he has reached the semi-finals, while Nadal lost for a fourth time in the Melbourne showpiece.

The result meant the 2009 winner was unable to become the first man in the Open era to win all the Grand Slams at least twice.

More to follow.

  • Live scores, schedule and results
  • Follow the Australian Open on BBC TV, radio and online
  • Alerts: Get tennis news sent to your phone

Source link

Live Updates: Djokovic vs. Nadal

  • Posted: Jan 27, 2019

Live Updates: Djokovic vs. Nadal

ATPTour.com provides live updates of the 2019 Australian Open final

Seven years ago, Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal battled for five hours and 53 minutes on Rod Laver Arena in the Australian Open final. That clash remains the longest Grand Slam final in history, as well as the longest match of both players’ careers. There were 369 points played, 11 breaks of serve, classic rallies and barely a blink of an eye.

But there wasn’t only one winner. Djokovic may have emerged victorious from the match, lifting his third of what is now six Norman Brookes Challenge Cups in his trophy case. Nadal showed his fighting spirit and champion’s grit, leaving everything on the court as he always does. But tennis was the true winner that day. And the same should be the case on Sunday, as the pair faces off in what promises to be another all-time classic.

“These are the kind of matches that you live for, finals of Slams, playing the greatest rivals at their best,” Djokovic said. “What more can you ask for? This is where you want to be.”

Djokovic is trying to win his record seventh Australian Open title (tied w/Federer & Emerson with six) and claim his third consecutive major for the third time. The Serbian can also break a tie with Pete Sampras for the third-most Slam titles all-time, as they both own 14. Nadal is trying to become the first player in the Open Era to clinch the career Grand Slam twice. He can also earn his 18th major crown to move within two titles of Roger Federer’s record 20.

“We push each other to the limit of our tennis level,” Nadal said. “Tomorrow is going to be another episode.

“I think I found solutions against Novak during all my career, and he found solutions against me. It’s always about moments. In his best moments, he’s so difficult to beat. In my best moments, I have been a tough opponent, too.”

Djokovic

While Djokovic and Nadal have met 52 times in their FedEx ATP Head2Head series — more than any other pair of players in history — the 2012 final was their lone match at the Australian Open. So with that epic in mind, there is plenty of anticipation as top-seeded Djokovic and 2009 champion Nadal get set for their eighth Grand Slam final match-up.

For the seventh time, Nadal is into a major championship match without dropping a set. On each of the previous six occasions, the Spaniard has gone on to lift the trophy.

Tennis Radio

That may be mildly surprising considering Nadal arrived at Melbourne Park without competing since last year’s US Open semi-final, in which he retired due to injury. The World No. 2’s longest match by time came in the third round, in which he beat #NextGenATP Aussie Alex de Minaur 6-1, 6-2, 6-4 in two hours and 22 minutes.

His most impressive performance, however, came in the semi-finals. Reigning Next Gen ATP Finals champion Stefanos Tsitsipas entered the last four straight off back-to-back wins against six-time Melbourne titlist Roger Federer and in-form Spaniard Roberto Bautista Agut. But Nadal lost just six games against the Greek to advance to his fifth final at the year’s first Grand Slam.

“He has played impressively well throughout the entire tournament. He hasn’t dropped a set. He looked as good as ever on the hard court throughout these few weeks,” Djokovic said. “I haven’t played bad myself [my] past couple matches. I think that this final comes at the right time for both of us. I’m sure we’re going to have a blast on the court.”

Nadal

Djokovic had lost two sets heading into his semi-final against Pouille. But the Serbian took notice of Nadal’s performance on Thursday evening and produced his best effort of the fortnight on Friday, dropping just four games. It was just the seventh time in the Open Era that a man had lost four games or less in a major semi-final.

Was he trying to concede fewer games than Nadal?

“Yes. It was hard to do that, but somehow I managed [it],” Djokovic said, cracking a smile.

Read: 10 Fast Facts Ahead Of The Australian Open Final

As always, it will be fascinating to watch the baseline battles between the pair. Nadal, using his recently-tweaked serve with success during the tournament to take control earlier in rallies, will look to take a crack as early in points and as far inside the court as possible. On the other side, Djokovic will use his pretzel-like flexibility to neutralise those attacks and step into the court. It never gets tiresome to see cross-court rallies between Nadal’s forehand and Djokovic’s backhand, two of the best shots in the sport.

Take The ATP Djokovic-Nadal Rivalry Quiz

This time last year, Djokovic was struggling with a right elbow injury, one that forced him to undergo a procedure after the Australian Open. The Serbian would start 2018 with a 6-6 record. But after winning Wimbledon, completing his Career Golden Masters at Cincinnati and triumphing at the US Open, Djokovic now has a chance to win his third major in a row. And while it will surely be difficult against Nadal, he cherishes these moments. 

“There’s so much at stake, it’s hard to pick one thing. Obviously making history of the sport that I love is an honour and is a privilege. It’s a huge motivation,” Djokovic said. “At the same time Nadal is across the net. We’re playing [the] final of a Grand Slam for the record seventh title here. If you don’t get motivated by all these things, then something is wrong.”

Source link

Herbert & Mahut win men's doubles to complete career Slam

  • Posted: Jan 27, 2019
Australian Open 2019 men’s final
Venue: Melbourne Park Date: 27 January
Coverage: BBC Radio 5 live commentary from 08:30 GMT, live text commentary on the BBC Sport website, and watch highlights on BBC TV and online at 14:20

France’s Pierre-Hugues Herbert and Nicolas Mahut won the Australian Open men’s doubles title to complete a career Grand Slam.

The fifth seeds beat Finland’s Henri Kontinen and Australian John Peers 6-4 7-6 (7-1).

Hugues and Mahut won the men’s doubles together at the French Open in 2018, and claimed titles at Wimbledon in 2016 and the US Open in 2015.

They are the eighth team to complete the career Grand Slam.

  • ‘Robot’ Osaka had to ‘turn off feelings’ in win
  • Djokovic & Nadal renew ‘biggest rivalry’
  • Live scores, schedule and results

Source link

Rankings Update: Djokovic & Nadal Pulling Away From The Pack

  • Posted: Jan 27, 2019

Rankings Update: Djokovic & Nadal Pulling Away From The Pack

The Top 2 players in the ATP Rankings are pulling away from the rest of the field

Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal meet in the final of a Grand Slam for the eighth time on Sunday (Nadal leads 4-3), with the Australian Open title on the line for the winner. But regardless of who emerges from Rod Laver Arena as the champion, the top two seeds will pull away from the pack on Monday when the new ATP Rankings are released.

Since Djokovic was ousted in the fourth round by Hyeon Chung and Nadal retired in the fifth set of his quarter-final against Marin Cilic in 2018, both players had ATP Ranking points to gain with a deep run in Melbourne this year. They have taken full advantage by battling to the championship match. Djokovic will remain World No. 1 on 28 January, and Nadal will stay at No. 2. But even if Nadal loses to Djokovic, the 17-time major champion will be 1,845 points ahead of World No. 3 Zverev.

The winner of the Australian Open receives 2,000 points, and the runner-up adds 1,200 to his tally. So if Nadal claims his second trophy in Melbourne (also 2009), he will have 9,120 points on Monday, placing him a whopping 2,645 points ahead of Zverev.

If Djokovic wins, not only will he and Nadal have a significant gap ahead of the field, but the Serbian will strengthen his advantage over Nadal. A record-breaking seventh Norman Brookes Challenge Cup for Djokovic will give him 10,955 points, which would mean a 2,635-point cushion over Nadal, who would have 8,320 points.

Djokovic & Nadal’s ATP Ranking Points On 28 January, Pending Australian Open Final

 Player  Champion  Finalist
 Novak Djokovic  10,955  10,155
 Rafael Nadal  9,120  8,320

What is even more important about that is Djokovic’s relative lack of points to defend in the coming months. The World No. 1 lost in the first round at Indian Wells and Miami — the first two ATP Masters 1000 events of the year — last season, giving him just 20 points. So any matches he wins at those two events will be a bonus.

Since Nadal did not compete at those prestigious tournaments last year, the Spaniard has zero points to defend there. That will give the left-handed 32-year-old a chance to add more of a cushion to his lead ahead of the rest of the ATP Tour before the clay-court season.

Nadal earned a 24-1 record with four titles from five European clay events in 2018, so he will have to defend 4,860 points during that stretch. Djokovic, on the other hand, only has 855 points to defend across those same five tournaments.

Take The ATP Djokovic-Nadal Rivalry Quiz

After that World No. 3 Zverev (6,475 points), No. 4 Juan Martin del Potro (5,060) — who is set to return from injury at the Delray Beach Open — and No. 5 Kevin Anderson (4,845) will fill out the Top 5. Six-time champion Roger Federer began the fortnight at World No. 3, but his fourth-round loss to Stefanos Tsitsipas coupled with the 2,000 points he was defending as last year’s titlist, will see the Swiss drop to No. 6.

The other Top 10 player set for a significant drop is Marin Cilic, who will fall to No. 10. The Croat, who was defending 1,200 points after reaching the 2018 final, lost to Roberto Bautista Agut in the fourth round.

Source link

Laver's Grand Slam: 1969 Australian Open, 50 Years On

  • Posted: Jan 26, 2019

Laver’s Grand Slam: 1969 Australian Open, 50 Years On

In the first of a four-part series this year, Rod Laver looks back 50 years to the 1969 Australian Open, the first step to his historic second Grand Slam.

Of medium build, red-haired Rod Laver looked fragile and was bow-legged, but with fast anticipation and reactions he hit the ball a ton by swinging hard and fast at everything. He could crush an opponent with his power, off either side — forehand or backhand — and his speed and wrist power enabled him to strike winners from outside of the court. In using heavy underspin on his backhand side, he struck hard, and attacked with pace. His forehand would be chipped or hit with underspin, other times he’d jump in and clobber the ball. More often than not, the shot was unreturnable. Competent on low balls, anything waist high or above would be creamed. His lobbing ability was first class. His first serve was hard and flat, the timing of his second delivery, initially affected as an amateur, was strengthened as a contract pro to become a weapon.

It’s difficult to convey to those who never witnessed first-hand the style of Laver, long removed from his heyday as a player, when the supreme and honest Australian champion was a wonderful endorsement to his sport. As one of two men to capture the four major singles championships of Australia, France, England and the United States in the same season, the legendary 80-year-old is revered, universally respected and rightly feted for his record without parallel, with the main show court at Melbourne Park, venue of the Australian Open, named in his honour in 2000. For Laver won not just one calendar-year sweep — as did Maureen Connolly in 1953, Margaret Court in 1970 and Steffi Graf in 1988 — but two, having first replicated Don Budge’s 1938 feat in 1962, in his final season as an amateur, and again in 1969, as a professional. Once the International Tennis Federation voted to recategorise the definition of the ‘Grand Slam’ in 1982, six other men — and seven other women — were added to the expanded list, having captured all four major championships in non-consecutive years for the ‘Career Grand Slam’, namely Fred Perry (1935), Roy Emerson (1964), Andre Agassi (1999) and also today’s celebrated trio of Roger Federer (2009), Rafael Nadal (2010) and Novak Djokovic (2016).

Laver is simply happy “to be the among the best of his era”. But like another immortal Australian sportsman, Don Bradman, who averaged 99.94 runs per innings in Test cricket over a 20-year career, it’s highly likely that Laver’s record of two calendar-year Grand Slams will never be broken. As Geoffrey Green, predominantly known for his football writing in The Times for almost 40 years, once observed, “Laver, in his world, has what Bradman once had in his at the wicket — a quicker eye than the next man, lithe speed, perfect balance, and an early take of the ball on the rise. His wrist is of steel, his sense of timing and accuracy of the masked return quite uncanny.”

As a winner of 200 singles titles across three decades of amateur and professional competition, Laver sits alone on a pedestal, removed from the sport’s other all-time great competitors — Tony Wilding, Bill Tilden, Ellsworth Vines, Perry, Budge, Pancho Gonzales, Lew Hoad, Ken Rosewall, Bjorn Borg, John McEnroe, Ivan Lendl, Pete Sampras, Agassi, Federer, Nadal and Djokovic. “My idol, Lew Hoad, won the first three majors of 1956, but lost the US Championships final to his ‘twin’, Ken Rosewall, before turning pro,” Laver told ATPTour.com. “Since I retired, I always thought John McEnroe, a young Boris Becker and Pete Sampras were capable of winning the Grand Slam. And, in recent years, Roger, Rafa and Novak. But the wait continues. It’s got to happen again.”

Laver, Djokovic

Laver’s first steps to immortality in competition ‘open’ to amateur and professionals, 50 seasons ago, saw the 30-year-old travel from his California home and back to Queensland for the first time in three years, to see his mother and father, who was aged 70. The first 48-player, eight-day Australian Open was set to be held — for the seventh, and final time — on the Milton grass courts in Brisbane’s Frew Park, boasting a 7,000-seater stadium. “I’d beaten Neale Fraser to win the 1960 Australian Open in Brisbane, to become the first Queenslander champion,” remembers Laver, 50 years on. “The courts were patchy and bad bouncing; the pavilion was just as I’d remembered it as a kid. It was one of the most dispiriting tournaments I’d ever played in, as the humidity was intense and the seedings were odd — facing Emerson [the 1963-67 champion] and Fred Stolle so early on.

“Having won the Wimbledon title in 1968, I’d told my wife, Mary, towards the end of the season that I wanted to play all four of the major championships the following year. She agreed, ‘Go ahead, it’s your life with tennis.’ Completing another Grand Slam, after six years in the wilderness as a pro, was already on my mind when I arrived in Brisbane. With a cortisone injection in my left elbow, a product of going for a ball and falling on my left wrist in Boston in June 1968, I started against Massimo Di Domenico in the second round. Before every match I needed to wrap my elbow in a canvas pad for 20 minutes, then I iced it after each match. Right from the start, the January heat in Brisbane was excessive and the humidity was oppressive.”

Di Domenico, who joined four other Italian players — Vittorio Crotta, Pietro Marzano, Adriano Panatta and Piero Toci — on the tour of Australia and New Zealand, told ATPTour.com, “I remember walking with Rod along the tunnel leading to the Centre Court and being quite nervous. Rod was very friendly and talkative, which relaxed me a bit. I played reasonably well, although I lost 6-2, 6-2, 6-3, but Rod was always complimentary when I played a good shot. After the match, Rod asked me to practice with him in the following days, but with my English not being very good, Martin Mulligan, as our coach, stepped in to help fix the agreement.”

Then came No. 11 seed Emerson, the five-time defending champion, who would partner Laver to the doubles title later in the week. In their 31 matches between 1958 and 1962, the pair had met at seven major championships. “Playing Rod was always tough,” Emerson told ATPTour.com. “Harry Hopman [the long-time Davis Cup coach and captain] placed such great emphasis on Australians playing together that we always practised together and partnered up in doubles, so there were no surprises in new strokes or tactics. It all came down to a matter of points, a ball hitting a line or not. I was two years older than Rod and, over the course of our long careers in the amateur and pro games, we played over 70 times. I liked playing against left-handers, having partnered Neale Fraser, who was a great player, in 1959.

“Rod didn’t have the biggest serve of all time, and players used to target his second serve a lot. He was a slow starter too, so often I attempted to get off to the best possible start, but once he found his range and rhytmn later in a match there was no stopping some of his groundstrokes, particularly in the best-of-five sets format that we regularly played.”

Laver remembers, “The match started at 9 p.m. and could have gone on to 2 a.m.! Emmo served at 7-6 in the fourth set, but I eventually won [6-2, 6-4, 3-6, 9-7].” Emerson, who captured the first two major singles championships of 1963 and 1967, adds, “The biggest difference between Laver of 1962 and 1969 was he was more experienced, he had tightened up his strokes and was a seasoned player.”

”Scheduled to play 10 hours after beating Emerson, the weather posed another threat,” recalls Laver, of his quarter-final against Fred Stolle. “In January, Brisbane can get like a sauna, so in [38°C] afternoon heat, drinks were inexplicably left out in the sun to warm up. There was no ice. We threatened to walk off unless they were replaced with cold drinks. Fred had such a good serve, first volley and backhand, so I struggled to get through him [6-4, 18-16, 6-4], but what I remember is loud music from a wedding party was being played beyond the court. Rochey beat John Newcombe in a five-set quarter-final and their request for the music to be turned down was declined. For some reason, the organisers also decided to take time off to go to the races, a fact not lost on the pros, because the Australian LTA, at the time, was not in favour of Open tennis [which had begun in April 1968]. Incredibly, at one point, there were not enough linesmen and Bill Bowrey and Ray Ruffels played their quarter-final without them.”

The New South Wales Open, staged one week before the first Australian Open, highlighted how good promotion and enthusiasm ensured that Open tennis had captured the Sydney public’s imagination. But in Brisbane, a city that was at the time a quarter of the size of Sydney, and with most residents still away in their beach houses on holiday, the high-quality tennis on show at the Milton Courts was lost. Having pruned tournament expenses from $30,000 to $28,000 in the week before the first Australian Open, when organisers realised that attendances would be small, the eight-day, three-night tournament gate receipts were $14,000. The overall financial loss was $13,500 and at the Lawn Tennis Association of Australia A.G.M. later in the year, a decision was taken that in future the championship would be held between the larger cities of Sydney and Melbourne, which became the event’s permanent city in 1972.

Having made it through to the semi-finals, Laver then contested the longest match of his career. Fourth seed Tony Roche, then 23 years of age, had beaten Laver one week earlier in the New South Wales Open in Sydney and would become his main rival in 1969, winning five of their nine matches. “In the five years of being a contract pro, I hadn’t played any left-handers, but now Rochey, who was a part of the ‘Handsome Eight’ and used to playing other lefties Roger Taylor and Nikki Pilic, was my opponent. It was 95 per cent humidity for the midday start, the toughest match of my Grand Slam year. Rochey wore a handkerchief around his neck, I went through three sun hats. My brother, Trevor, had phoned before I stepped out onto court, saying he would come to watch at two o’clock, so hope I’d still be playing.”

In the eighth longest singles match played at the time, Laver “swallowed a couple of glucose tablets, salt pills and draped ice towels over his head at the change of ends”. Both players put web cabbage leaves in their hats to keep them cool in Laver’s 7-5, 22-20, 9-11, 1-6, 6-3 victory in four hours and 40 minutes. The second set alone, lasted two hours and five minutes and Roche told ATPTour.com, “I remember having five or six set points in the second set and when we both took a shower after the end of the third set, I thought ‘Rocket’ looked ‘stuffed’ and I’d got him.”

Upon the resumption of play, Laver said, “Rochey came out hitting heavy serves and solid volleys to take a 5-0 lead.” But the match turned with Laver leading 4-3 in the decider, when Roche served down the middle at 15/30. “I sliced under my backhand for a crosscourt,” said Laver, who had chipped returns to Roche’s feet all match. “Rochey watched it go by, thinking it was out, but there was no call. Tony lost his concentration, but I went on to win. I wasn’t thinking of the Grand Slam at the time. That was the equivalent of playing nine sets. Fitness had something to do with being able to compete that day.” The following day, the Brisbane Courier-Mail noted, “In between points in the fifth set, both Laver and Roche appeared ready to topple in exhaustion… never have two players been so evenly matched in sheer guts and brilliance on Milton’s centre court.” Incredibly, the following week, in Auckland, Roche beat Laver in four sets for the title.

Laver’s opponent in the final, ninth seed Andres Gimeno, who had beaten Butch Buchholz, Ruffels and Rosewall without dropping a set, told ATPTour.com, “The night before I played Rosewall, it rained a lot and the court was very slippery. I wore spikes and played very well, but Ken was wearing normal shoes and was sliding a lot. I played well in the other matches, but in the final, Rod played too good!” Laver, who’d soaked for hours in a baking-soda bath in his motel room after his victory over Roche, remembers, “My troublesome left elbow held up, but Gimeno lacked energy in the final. He was an artist, in placing and stroking the ball without a lot of heavy top spin. But he didn’t take his chances to break in the third set.” Laver won 6-3, 6-4, 7-5 for his third Australian crown and collected the $4,500 first prize.

Today, only one photograph exists of the trophy ceremony of the first Australian Open on 27 January 1969. Even when looking at the black-and-white snap, the freckles, the slight frame and the muscular left forearm are unmistakable. Laver, with sweat on his brow and a white towel wrapped around his shoulders, looks the president of the Lawn Tennis Association of Australia, Charles Edwards, straight in the eyes upon receiving the sterling silver and silver gilt Norman Brookes Challenge Cup, which took 800 man-hours to create in 1926. The scene, on the middle of three grass courts at the Milton Courts in Brisbane, witnessed by a sparse crowd on green wooden bleachers and as few as 15 journalists, was the first step of Laver’s historic ninth-month journey to the calendar-year Grand Slam.

Coming up in May 2019: Laver Reflects On 1969 Roland Garros

Source link

'I turned off my feelings like a robot'

  • Posted: Jan 26, 2019
Australian Open 2019
Venue: Melbourne Park Dates: 14-27 January
Coverage: Daily live commentaries on the BBC Sport website, listen to Tennis Breakfast daily from 07:00 GMT on BBC Radio 5 live sports extra and watch highlights on BBC TV and online.

Australian Open champion Naomi Osaka says she had to be a “robot” and turn off her feelings to hold her nerve and win the final against Petra Kvitova.

The Japanese, 21, had tears in her eyes after having three match points saved by her Czech opponent in the second set – before winning 7-6 (7-2) 5-7 6-4.

“You know how some people get worked up about things? That’s a very human thing to do,” said Osaka.

“Sometimes I feel like I don’t want to waste my energy doing stuff like that.”

US Open winner Osaka became the first player since American Jennifer Capriati in 2001 to follow her maiden Grand Slam title with victory at the next one.

Her triumph in Melbourne will also take her to the top of the world rankings on Monday.

“I felt like I didn’t want to have any regrets,” said Osaka, who was the fourth seed at the tournament. “If I didn’t regroup after the second set, then I would have looked back on this match and probably cried.

“I just thought to myself that this is my second time playing a final, I can’t really act entitled. To be playing against one of the best players in the world, to lose a set – to suddenly think that I’m so much better than her, that isn’t a possibility.

“I literally just tried to turn off all my feelings. I just felt kind of hollow, like I was a robot.”

  • Osaka’s victory: how it happened
  • Men’s final preview: Djokovic & Nadal renew ‘biggest rivalry’
  • Live scores, schedule and results

‘I was in a state of shock’

Having endeared herself to fans with her quirky news conferences and awkward acceptance speeches, she remained true to herself when she looked grateful to have the trophy taken out of her hands while apologising for public speaking not being her “strong point”.

“I felt like I was in a state of shock through the entire trophy presentation,” she said.

“Of course I felt very disappointed and sad when I had three match points. I tried to tell myself there’s nothing I can do about it – told myself I’m playing a final and need to keep fighting and couldn’t act immature.”

Osaka has in the past discussed Netflix, memes and computer game Overwatch in news conferences and after winning her first Masters title at Indian Wells last year made what she described as “the worst acceptance speech of all time”.

Rise from world number 72 in a year ‘not fast’

Last January, Osaka was ranked 72 in the world and had never progressed past the fourth round of a Grand Slam.

But the Japanese said her rise to two-time major champion and world number one in the space of a year “does not feel fast”.

“It felt kind of long,” she said. “I guess looking from the outside it does.

“For me, every practice and every match I’ve played, it feels like the year is short and long at the same time.

“But I’m aware of all the work that I put in. I know all the sacrifices every player does to stay at this level.”

Osaka claimed her first Grand Slam by beating American 23-time champion Serena Williams in a dramatic final in New York last September, backing that up immediately with more success in Melbourne.

“I had dreams I’d win this tournament,” she said. “Every time I have a dream somehow I accomplish it. I feel like it is a strange moment. I feel like I’m living now but it is not necessarily real.

“The ranking was never my real goal, my goal was just to win this tournament.”

Osaka’s career timeline

  • 2015: Ranked 143rd in the world and failed to go beyond the first round of a Grand Slam.
  • 2016: Broke into the top 40 and was voted WTA Newcomer of the Year. Reached the third round at Australian Open, French Open and US Open.
  • 2017: Second straight top 100 finish (ended world number 68). Reached the third round of Wimbledon and US Open.
  • 2018: Broke into the world’s top five, finishing the year as number four. Won her first WTA title at Indian Wells in March and won her first Grand Slam at the US Open in September.
  • 2019: Becomes the first Asian player to become world number one. Wins her second Grand Slam at the Australian Open and becomes the first player since 2001 to win back-to-back Slams after their maiden title.

‘Painful’ defeat for Kvitova but ‘amazing’ to even be in final

Two-time Wimbledon champion Kvitova said she was proud of reaching her first Grand Slam final since being stabbed with a knife in a robbery at her home in December 2016.

The 28-year-old Czech feared she would “never pick up a racquet again” after needing surgery on her playing left hand.

She remarkably returned to the sport five months after the attack, going on to win six WTA titles since and will climb back up to number two in the rankings on Monday.

Despite being proud of her achievements, she still described Saturday’s defeat by Osaka as “painful”.

“I don’t know how long will take me to get over it,” said Kvitova, who was the eighth seed in Melbourne.

“It’s hurting a lot. I wanted to win and have the trophy – but I think I already won two years ago. So for me, it’s amazing.”

Defeat meant Kvitova missed out on becoming world number one for the first time, but she admitted she never envisaged climbing so high in the rankings following the attack.

“I wanted to be back at my greatest level, probably as I played before,” she said.

“I knew it would be very, very difficult because my hand is not 100% and never will be.

“I’m just trying to take maximum from the minimum.

“I don’t think that I could really imagine being this kind of player again.”

  • Follow the Australian Open on BBC TV, radio and online
  • Alerts: Get tennis news sent to your phone

Source link