Read & Watch: 5 Things To Know About Rublev, Who Qualified For Milan
Oct242018
Russian was the top seed in 2017
It was a title match that got away from Andrey Rublev, but now the Russian has qualified to make a second run at the Next Gen ATP Finals crown.
The 21-year-old Moscow native has qualified for the Next Gen ATP Finals, joining Alexander Zverev of Germany, Greece’s Stefanos Tsitsipas, Denis Shapovalov of Canada, Aussie Alex de Minaur and Americans Frances Tiafoe and Taylor Fritz as players to have qualified for the 21-and-under event, to be held 6-10 November at the Fiera Milano. (Zverev will not play in Milan because of his Nitto ATP Finals qualification.)
Eight players will compete next month, with the final spot reserved for the winner of an all-Italian qualifying tournament to finish on 4 November. Rublev fell in last year’s Milan final to Hyeon Chung of South Korea. Here are five things to know about the fiery Russian:
1. He Played In A ‘One Direction’ Tribute Band Rip forehands, record singles – Rublev does a bit of everything. Years ago, he and childhood friends Ivan Juravlev, Slava Naumkin and Vlad Naumkin formed the band “Summer Afternoon”. A few years ago, they released their first music video, a cover of One Direction’s “Steal My Girl”.
You May Also Like: Not Just One Direction For Rublev
But don’t expect Rublev to drop his racquet in favour of a guitar anytime soon. He said in September 2015: “For sure in the future I would like to release some music… But tennis comes first and we’ll see what happens later. The band will do more music, but I don’t know if I’m going to be part of it or not. Right now, tennis is the most important thing for me.”
Watch: “Summer Afternoon” Covers “Steal My Girl”
2. It’s His Second Time In Milan Last year Rublev was one of the leaders of the #NextGenATP group. The Russian not only qualified for the inaugural Next Gen ATP Finals; he was the tournament’s top seed and was dominating the final until Chung reversed momentum.
“I understand that I have to change, and I agree. I will try to do my best,” said Rublev, after losing despite leading by a set and 3-1. “I think even if you compare me in the beginning of the year, still I’m much better. Mentally I’m much better. I’m controlling better my emotions. But still, there is long way to go. If I want to compete with good players, it’s not enough.”
3. He Made History In Umag Rublev was done. He had lost his final match in qualifying at the 2017 Plava Laguna Croatia Open Umagand was thinking about his next tournament. But then Borna Coric withdrew, Rublev became a lucky loser, and the Russian enjoyed one of the best weeks of his career.
Read & Watch: Rublev Beats Lorenzi For Maiden Title In Umag
Rublev beat third seed and defending champion Fabio Fognini in the quarter-finals and home favourite Ivan Dodig in the semi-finals before knocking out Italy’s Paolo Lorenzi in the title match. Rublev became the seventh lucky loser to win an ATP World Tour title and the first since Rajeev Ram at Newport in 2009.
Watch Highlights: Rublev Wins Maiden Title In Umag
4. He Gets His Fight From His Dad Rublev is an emotional player on the court, shouting and pumping himself up throughout the match. He gets that tenacity from his father, who was a boxer in Moscow.
Watch: At Home With Rublev In Moscow
5. In New York, He Was The Youngest Since… Last year,during his second US Open, Rublev upset two Top 15 players – No. 9 Grigor Dimitrov and No. 14 David Goffin, who would later compete in the 2017 Nitto ATP Finals title match – en route to the quarter-finals, where he fell to No. 1 Rafael Nadal. Rublev became the youngest US Open quarter-finalist since Andy Roddick in 2001.
“The main thing now is to try to keep working harder and harder, to improve, because I still have a lot of things to improve,” Rublev said after losing to Nadal. “This match told me how far I am and how much I need to improve, so now it is time to try to be better and become stronger.”
Spaniard & American are only players to feature in both Top 10 lists for service points won on hard and clay
A hidden dynamic of clay court versus hard court tennis is perfectly illustrated with points won behind second serves. You would naturally think that serving on a hard court would be preferred for both first and second serves, but it’s simply not the case.
An Infosys ATP Beyond The Numbers analysis of points won behind first and second serves on both hard and clay courts last season surprisingly reveals a higher win percentage behind second serves on clay.
The data set includes the leading 20 players in the First and Second Serve Points Won categories on both clay and hard in the 2017 season.
2017 First Serves: Leading 20 Players Average Points Won
Surface
Percentage
Hard court
78.0%
Clay court
75.1%
It’s clear to see that first-serve performance was superior on hard over clay, but that flips when we examine second serves.
2017 Second Serves: Leading 20 Players Average Points Won
Surface
Percentage
Hard court
53.9%
Clay court
55.3%
An analysis of World No. 1, Rafael Nadal confirms the advantage clay has over hard when the point starts with a second serve. In 2017, Nadal led the ATP World Tour in winning second serve points on both hard and clay courts, with his performance on clay being superior to hard.
2017: Nadal Second Serve Points Won
Surface
Percentage
No. 1 on hard court
60.3% (706/1171 in 49 matches)
No. 1 on clay court
64.1% (307/479 in 25 matches)
This dynamic was also true for one of the biggest servers on the ATP World Tour; John Isner. The 6’10” American won 56.1 per cent (510/909) of second-serve points on hard courts, but that rose to 58.3 per cent (187/321) on clay. Isner was the only other player besides Nadal that featured in the Top 10 in winning second-serve points on both clay and hard.
One reason to explain this dynamic is that raw power is sought after behind first serves, and the ball slows down less at impact on a hard court than a clay court. But power is not the main ingredient of second serves. The focus switches to what the ball does when it reacts with the court, with the granules of clay “grabbing” a ball better and producing a higher kick off clay than hard.
It turns out that a heavy kick second serve is rewarded more on clay than we ever thought.
Sloane Stephens beat Kiki Bertens at the WTA Finals, in a result that spared US Open champion Naomi Osaka early elimination.
The American, 25, won six of the last seven games to claim the match 7-6 (7-4) 2-6 6-3.
The victory means all four players in the Red Group can still qualify or be eliminated going into the final games.
Osaka has lost both her round-robin matches, but can progress if she wins and the other result goes her way.
In Friday’s final round of fixtures, Osaka plays Bertens while Stephens faces Angelique Kerber, who beat Osaka earlier on Wednesday and has one win from two.
Stephens and Bertens, 26, traded breaks throughout in a match which saw momentum change regularly.
Fifth seed Stephens won the first-set tie-break, before Bertens broke three times in the second set to win it in 36 minutes.
The third set continued the trend as the Dutchwoman won the first two games before Stephens took the match away from her. The 25-year-old now has two wins from two in the group stage, while Bertens has one.
WTA Finals: Everything you need to know
Earlier on Wednesday, Kerber beat Osaka 6-4 5-7 6-4 in a match that included 11 breaks of serve.
Germany’s Kerber, 30, won the first set and was a break up at 5-4 in the second, but the Japanese fought back to level the match. Kerber then won the final set to clinch the match, which lasted 2 hours and 31 minutes.
There is a similar situation in the White Group, in which Elina Svitolina, Karolina Pliskova, Caroline Wozniacki and Petra Kvitova can all still qualify after two matches.
The WTA Finals feature the top eight players this year, split into two groups of four. The top two from each group progress to the semi-finals, with the final on Sunday.
We use technology such as cookies on our website, to provide functions and analysis of our visitor data. Click Accept to confirm that you agree to its use.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.