Bob Bryan and Mike Bryan extended their rich vein of form on Sunday when they captured their sixth Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters doubles title. Their 7-6(5), 6-3 victory over Oliver Marach and Mate Pavic in 79 minutes keeps up the pressure on the early leaders of the ATP Doubles Race To London, for one of the eight spots at the Nitto ATP Finals at The O2 in November.

Bob Bryan admitted their form in the principality of Monaco may be down to a lucky charm he received this week. During the on-court trophy ceremony Bob admitted, “Thank you to Prince Albert in the stands there, he gave me a lucky coin on the first day of the tournament and he told me to keep it in my bag. It’s been good luck, so I will keep it in my bag for the rest of the year.”

Three weeks on from picking up the Miami Open presented by Itau crown (d. Khachanov/Rublev), the American twins have now clinched their 38th ATP World Tour Masters 1000 trophy. Also, seven days from their 40th birthday, the Bryans split $289,670 in prize money with their record 116th tour-level team title. They have reached the championship match in each of their past four tournaments — including the Abierto Mexicano Telcel presentado por HSBC (l. to Murray/Soares) and the BNP Paribas Open (l. to Isner/Sock).

The fourth-seeded Bryans could not convert two break point opportunities on Marach’s serve when leading 3-2 and squandered two set point chances on the Austrian’s serve at 5-4 in the first set. The Bryans then fought hard to recover from a 2/5 deficit in the tie-break following aggressive play by their opponents and sealed the 47-minute opener with their fifth straight point, after Marach struck a forehand out.

After an early exchange of breaks in the second set, the Bryans broke Pavic’s serve twice, in the fifth game — courtesy of a double fault — then again when leading 5-3, as third seeds Marach and Pavic each committed two errors.

Mike Bryan said, “Great job to Oliver and Mate this week as it’s been a great start to the season for you. Mate, I think you’re 24 and it’s your first appearance in Monte-Carlo, we’ve been playing here 20 years and we’re turning 40 next week, so you have plenty of chances to win the title here.

The Bryans improve to 2-2 lifetime against Marach and Pavic, who began the year by winning 17 straight matches, including three consecutive titles at the Qatar ExxonMobil Open, the ASB Classic and their first Grand Slam championship at the Australian Open.

The Austrian-Croatian tandem shared $141,820 in prize money and earned 600 ATP Doubles Rankings points.

“Congratulations on a great tournament to the Bryans, I don’t know how you keep winning,” said Pavic, during the on-court trophy ceremony. “It was a great week for us.”

Marach added, “Well done guys, a great few weeks and I hope we can battle it out more this season. I’d like to pay credit to Mate, as I didn’t know we would play together this week and I hope you get better soon… This is one of my favourite tournaments, you all do a great job.”

Did You Know?
Bob Bryan and Mike Bryan have now won multiple titles in each of their past 18 seasons on tour, dating back to their first championship triumph in Memphis (2001).

Fifty years ago, tennis was a non-commercial enterprise with amateur players receiving tournament expenses, often better than the living wage, and were still able to compete in the world’s leading tennis tournaments. Across the great divide, ever since the first pro tour in 1926, were a small band of former amateurs turned contract pros, who had been banished from the public spotlight and criss-crossed the globe in search of a pay cheque. Over the course of one eventful decade, starting in the late 1950s, a handful of leading powerbrokers began to effect a change in the way the sport was promoted, for a free, shared market that led to the modern professional game of superstar athletes.

The featherboard fence, on the upper extremities of the centre court, had got a new coat of light green paint. Fold-up wooden chairs, many of which had first been used in 1927, when the Hard Court Championships of Great Britain was first held in Bournemouth, were laid out on concrete walkways surrounding the main show court — 12 steps up on one bank adjacent to No. 1 court, nine steps up on the other side. The front two rows of seats were always occupied by old ladies, with thermos flasks and rugs over their legs, who never moved. Dark green canvas framed the red shale court, with an exit to a wide walkway — “nerve-wracking when walking out, but exhilarating coming back with a victory,” Mark Cox, the first amateur to beat a professional in an ‘open’ tournament, told ATPWorldTour.com 50 years on. The old wooden pavilion, colonial in style with a front-facing veranda, “had a long bar, changing rooms with wooden lockers and showers that didn’t work quite as effectively as they should.”

It was here at The West Hants Lawn Tennis Club in Melville Park, Bournemouth, close to eight miles of sandy beaches in the south of England, that after morning rain 50 years ago today, on 22 April 1968, two sides of the same coin — amateurs and professional players, who had been barred for more than 40 years from playing on the sport’s greatest stages — began to compete together in the same draw at an ‘open’ tournament. Ticket sales of 23,000 were at a 20-year high, and the programme noted, “Yes, ‘open’ tennis has come at last and Bournemouth has been entrusted with the task of a world-shaking launching.” Cox, now 74 and set to return to Bournemouth for a special celebration, told ATPWorldTour.com, “I just happened to be in the right place at the right time. The event was historic and the significance enormous, meaning the news went all over the world. It was the beginning of a new era.”

The seeds had been sown to put an end to long tolerated ‘shamateur’ tennis — illicit payments, more often better than the living wage, to guarantee deals with many of the leading amateurs globally — in late June 1966, when, during The Championships at Wimbledon, Jack Kramer (1921-2009) had been called to the BBC tent in order to meet the corporation’s head of sport Bryan Cowgill (1927-2008) and Herman David (1905-74), the All England Club chairman since 1959, who had long become tired of staging ‘second-class tennis’ and of the clandestine nature of attracting star amateur players to compete at tournaments. There, the trio agreed to stage a three-day Wimbledon World Lawn Tennis Professional Championships in 1967, over the 25-26 and 28 August bank holiday weekend. Kramer would supply eight players — Rod Laver, Ken Rosewall, Richard Pancho Gonzales, Andres Gimeno, Lew Hoad (a personal favourite of, and at the request of, David), Fred Stolle, Dennis Ralston and Earl Butch Buchholz — while the BBC provided the prize money of £16,500 (approximately £283,000 in 2018) and would launch their colour television service on their second channel, BBC Two, then under the control of famed naturalist Sir David Attenborough. The All England Club would undertake the administration and running of the event.

It proved to be a remarkable success, with 14,000 spectators watching Laver beat Rosewall, who almost didn’t play in the Monday final due to a stiff neck, 6-2, 6-2, 12-10 on Centre Court. It also highlighted what could be possible in an equal tennis world and cemented David’s view for the All England Club to stage an ‘open’ Wimbledon in June 1968. “Despite the success of the tournament, we still didn’t feel Open Tennis would happen,” Laver told ATPWorldTour.com. “But it did break the back of Open tennis. When players such as Rosewall, Gonzales and Hoad walked out onto Centre Court, the British public, so keen on tennis and Wimbledon, were so happy that they could watch us play.”

The All England Club had long supported ‘open’ tennis, a concept first mooted by player Charles Dixon (1873-1939) in the pages of English publication Lawn Tennis in 1909. Fifty years later, in December 1959, the Club had called an Extraordinary General Meeting to discuss the issue and a motion had been passed calling upon the British Lawn Tennis Association (LTA) to stage an open championship. The LTA, a majority of whose councillors supported the idea, had proposed such a motion at the International Lawn Tennis Federation (now ITF) A.G.M. in the summer of 1960 in Paris. Frustratingly, the motion “to end the distinction between amateurs and professionals” had failed by only five votes — 134 of the 209 votes — to reach the two-thirds majority (139) required for a major rule change.

All England Club chairman David, a Welsh expert on industrial diamonds, declared publicly that amateur tennis had become a “living lie”. A further vote was also comfortably defeated by 49 votes in 1964. Three years later, David’s reaction was unequivocal when the British LTA’s proposal to introduce a limited number of ‘open’ tournaments in 1968 was defeated by a majority of 56 at a 1967 meeting at Mondorf-les-Bains in Luxembourg. “It seems we have come to the end of the road constitutionally and that the only way to make the game honest is by unconstitutional action,” said David, when he heard of the latest defeat. “But any constitutional step must be taken by the LTA.”

On 5 October 1967, an LTA council meeting made public the proposal to delegates that “all reference to amateurs and professionals be deleted from the rules of the LTA, and that the Association itself should legislate only for players,” according to Tennis Pictorial International magazine. Derek Penman OBE (1915-2004), a future chairman of the British LTA in 1970, eloquently presented the proposal to “‘go it alone’ on open tournaments starting on 22 April 1968.” So, in a momentous LTA A.G.M., on 14 December 1967, in spite of the fact that Great Britain faced probable isolation from the international tennis community, a big stumbling block for some, the vote for ‘open’ tennis and a welcome to all players at The Championships at Wimbledon of 1968 was overwhelming (295-5 votes). The Swedish Lawn Tennis Association quickly aligned themselves with the view.

Ever since the first pro tour of 1926, many of the world’s best amateur players had opted for financial security, leaving behind the chance of competing at the sport’s biggest tournaments, in order to play one-nighters and, later, short-form organised tournaments on improvised courts in venues such as army drill halls, university gyms, empty warehouses and even ice rinks. Bill Tilden, wrote in his 1948 memoir, My Story, “If tennis is to realise its full potential, it must find a solution to the pro-amateur problem plaguing it for so many years. Only through such a solution can there be free competition among not just a few of the great players of the world, but among all of them. The sporting public wants to see the best. It doesn’t give a hoot whether that best is amateur or professional.”

As each year passed, the pressure continued to mount on the sport’s leaders and the amateur game fractured further in September 1967 with the launch of World Championship Tennis, initially by New Orleans promoter Dave Dixon (1923-2010), then, soon after, by the Texas oil millionaire Lamar Hunt (1932-2006) and his nephew, Al Hill Jr. (1945-2017). The WCT’s announcement was for a new professional tour starting in Australia in January 1968 and moving onto the United States, involving eight of the world’s leading players, popularly known as ‘The Handsome Eight’ — John Newcombe, Tony Roche, Cliff Drysdale, Pierre Barthes, Roger Taylor, Niki Pilic, Buchholz, Ralston. As John Barrett wrote at the time, “So, with one swift stroke, the cream had been skimmed from the top of the amateur milk.” Another promoter, former US Davis Cup captain George MacCall (1918-2008), soon signed Laver for a reported five-year $500,000 contract in January 1968, according to The New York Times, to join Rosewall, Gonzales, Gimeno and Stolle, plus a later addition Roy Emerson, for a 26-week National Tennis League (NTL) beginning two months later. “MacCall had taken over Kramer’s pro group when Kramer thought it was in the interests of the sport for him to step aside in the push for open tennis,” Barrett told ATPWorldTour.com. Robert Kelleher (1913-2012), then president of the United States Lawn Tennis Association (now USTA), guaranteed support after a February 1968 meeting at Coronado, California, which triggered more countries to fall into line with the proposal.

The official decision on ‘The Report of the Committee of Management on the Subject of Amateurism’ was taken on 30 March 1968, when in a Special General Meeting of the ILTF, held at Place de la Concorde in Paris, scene of another revolution almost 180 years earlier, 86 representatives from 47 nations this time voted unanimously in support of 12 ‘open’ tennis tournaments in eight countries. Pandora’s box wasn’t completely opened, however, as it was agreed that there would be several categories of ‘players’, thus protecting certain aspects of amateurism, in the 1968 season. As Fred Tupper of The New York Times noted, “amateurs, who are not paid; registered, who can profit from the sport while not making tennis his profession; or professionals, who make money from teaching or playing in events not organised by the national associations.” Barrett told ATPWorldTour.com, “From henceforth lawn tennis would be an ‘open’ sport, but not in the way Great Britain had hoped to see with everyone allowed to play in all tournaments. The compromise required to persuade the amateur diehards to vote for change was messy and would sow the seeds of future discord. Each nation was free to decide the status of their players within four new categories.”

The British LTA requested to stage nine ‘open’ tournaments in the summer of 1968 and in the end were allocated four events at Bournemouth (1927-76, 1978, 1980-1983, 1995-99), and three grass-court events: the Kent Championships at Beckenham (1886-1996) and the London Championships at The Queen’s Club and Wimbledon. There were eight other open tournaments that year, including two major championships at Roland Garros and the US Open, plus the Irish (Dublin), Swiss (Gstaad), Dutch (Hilversum), German (Hamburg), South American (Buenos Aires) championships, and the Pacific Southwest in Los Angeles. The following year, 1969, the ILTF granted ‘open’ status to 30 tournaments worldwide. “The British LTA decision was the light at the end of the tunnel, but we didn’t know how long it would take,” Laver told ATPWorldTour.com. “It had been almost six years since I turned pro, and back then I had to turn pro because I wasn’t making any money. The prospect of returning was all encompassing, because I had accepted that Open tennis wasn’t going to happen as it kept being voted out.”

Invitations were immediately sent out to leading amateurs after news broke that the world’s first ‘open’ tournament would be the Hard Court Championships of Great Britain in Bournemouth, which would be organised by the LTA with the support of Bristol-based tobacco manufacturer W. D. and H. O. Wills. Derek Hardwick (1921-1987), a member of The West Hants Lawn Tennis Club and outgoing chairman of the British LTA, who had lobbied so hard to gain support for ‘open’ tennis, said, “We invited every association to send players. I suppose the top amateurs won’t come to play professionals because the amateurs’ price would go down if they lost.” But Cox, a regular competitor in Bournemouth, ventures, “Perhaps, when the decision to enter was due, other leading amateurs may have defied their associations by entering.” The World Championship Tennis (WCT) troupe, now under the control of Hunt and Hill Jr., after buying out Dixon’s 50 per cent stake in March 1968, was on a tour of the United States, so National Tennis League (NTL) founder MacCall frantically organised for his players to compete on the south coast. After the staging of two indoor tournaments at Wembley in England and in Paris, competing on slippery red shale was a tough transition.

Rosewall, who had turned pro at the end of 1956 to guarantee his financial security shortly after marrying his wife, Wilma, told ATPWorldTour.com, “When Open tennis was agreed, MacCall, with Jack Kramer, helped in putting on some extra tournaments to prepare, so we switched between Cannes, Wembley and Paris before arriving in Bournemouth, my first visit there. Everyone was excited about it and we looked forward to playing in Bournemouth, for some of us, for the first time. George, a quiet man, arranged for us to stay in a hotel and we largely kept ourselves to ourselves, obviously knowing each other better over years of touring. Although we were aware of the other players.”

Six (Laver, Rosewall, Gimeno, Gonzales, Emerson and Stolle) of the eight seeds (which also included Owen Davidson, the professional coach to Great Britain’s Davis Cup team, and Bobby Wilson) were NTL professionals. Luis Ayala, then a coach in Puerto Rico, paid his own way to take part and 17 of the 32 draw were British players. Like Cox, believing he wouldn’t survive the early rounds, Wilson opted to collect tournament expenses of £50, as a first-round loser would receive £20. Cox, who remembers paying 10 shillings and six pence a night for a nearby Bournemouth bed and breakfast, told ATPWorldTour.com, “It was stepping into the unknown and perhaps some amateurs felt that taking prize money would mean that they couldn’t play elsewhere in Europe, or Davis Cup. I was associated with a stockbroking firm and never really thought of tennis as a career. There was no view of open tennis, so when I initially left university, playing felt like a gap year – great fun, and the expenses helped keep my head above water.”

Barrett told ATPWorldTour.com, “There was a huge excitement and also a sense of achievement. There was enormous pressure on the pros as they had shown such wonderful tennis at the 1967 Wimbledon Pro, that it was assumed they would sweep the board. The fact is they had played tennis together, so knew one another’s games.” Rosewall, a winner of eight major singles titles from 16 finals, certainly remembers, 50 years on, “There was some thought that the pros would be better than the amateurs and I felt it did lead to a tense situation during the week.” Laver, who won at the West Hants Club as an amateur before turning pro at the end of 1962, agrees with Barrett and Rosewall’s assessment, adding, “Because of the slippery nature of the courts, I struggled to find a solid grip and footing. The pressure was entirely on the pros that first week in Bournemouth, as it was an opportunity for the amateurs to show us how good they were.”

After a glorious weekend of fine weather, the start of main draw play in Bournemouth, which had been organised by Wimbledon referee Captain Mike Gibson (1916-1983) on Monday, 22 April 1967, was delayed by more than one hour due to drizzly rain that ultimately curtailed a number of the day’s completed matches to just four. Stolle and Peter Curtis had originally been scheduled to contest the first match of the day on centre court, but due to poor drainage the pair had to watch from the pavilion as John Clifton served the first point to Davidson on No. 1 court at 1:43 p.m. — according to a reporter from American weekly Sports Illustrated. Clifton completed a five-stroke rally with a smash winner. Watched by 100 fans and a dog, Davidson would go on to win the first match of the open era against one of his pupils, 6-2, 6-3, 4-6, 8-6, on the clubhouse court.

Eventually, Stolle took to centre court and beat Curtis 5-7, 6-4, 14-12, 6-1, in two hours and 30 minutes, in front of 500 spectators. “Matches between the pros and amateurs were not necessarily the one-side affair predicted by amateurs,” Stolle told ATPWorldTour.com. “In coming up against a younger player, playing for guaranteed expenses, I felt that they would have nothing to lose and do their very best. It meant that we, as professionals, were the ones with the reputations to lose. If they lost, it meant nothing.” In other results on day one, Barrett beat Montreal’s Keith Carpenter 6-2, 7-5, 6-1, for a second-round match against Laver, and Gimeno defeated Stanley Matthews Jr., son of a famous former Stoke, Blackpool and England footballer, 4-6, 6-4, 6-1, 6-2.

The BBC broadcast live on their first channel for three hours each afternoon from 23-26 April, with the ‘voice of tennis’ Dan Maskell (1908-1992), alongside Kramer, a commentator with the corporation since 1961, for centre court matches and Peter West (1920-2003) and Billy R. Knight describing the action on No. 1 court. While the first match between two professional players saw Gimeno beat Ayala 6-1, 6-0, 6-0 in the second round, it was 24-year-old Cambridge University graduate Cox, recently returned home following the Caribbean swing, who earned the headlines worldwide by becoming the first amateur player to beat a professional, Gonzales, 0-6, 6-2, 4-6, 6-3, 6-3 in two hours and 15 minutes. “I remember being in awe of Gonzales, he was an intimidating presence, but I had everything to gain as he was close to 40 and hadn’t played a best-of-five sets match for four years,” Cox told ATPWorldTour.com. “He was an incredibly charismatic, powerful individual. He was fearsome and his slightest utterance made everyone sit up and take notice.” Gonzales said, at the time, “Somebody had to be the first to lose, so it might as well be me. This open tennis is a whole new world.”

Cox then got the better of Emerson, one of the fittest player on the circuit, 6-0, 6-1, 7-5 for a place in the semi-finals. Emerson had led 4-1 in the third set and had a set point at 5-4, but was broken as Cox won 11 points in a row. In reflecting on that match, Cox told ATPWorldTour.com, “When ‘Emmo’ opened his shoulders and hit the ball, he was awesome. His footwork was so fast, but he wasn’t used to the courts, so he slipped and slid around.” One day later, Laver paid Cox a compliment in competing at his uncompromising best in a 6-4, 6-1, 6-0 victory. It earned the Briton a £4 prize for reaching the semi-finals. “Laver was a different league,” said Cox. “I was really a journeyman player. He had a superb backhand and really the full deck of cards. He was, and remains, incredibly humble of his achievements.” If, at the start of the week, he had opted to play as a professional, Cox would have earned £250 in prize money (approximately £4,100 in 2018).

And so 33-year-old Rosewall, having beaten Gimeno 6-2, 6-1, 6-3 in the other Bournemouth semi-final, contested the first championship match of the Open Era against his long-time rival Laver. “Gonzales had been the pro king, then Rosewall had easily been the best,” recalls Barrett to ATPWorldTour.com. “When the group was dying in 1962, they all collectively raised money to assist Laver in turning pro. Within a few years, he was the pro tour leader, but Rosewall was still able to hit the heights of his considerable powers.” Laver, 29, won the first set of the final 6-3 in 30 minutes, in dull, blustery conditions, then Rosewall responded with the 28-minute second set 6-2 and was leading 3-0 in the third set when heavy rain began to fall. Heavy covers were placed on centre court, which seated approximately 3,000 spectators, but the Australians had to return the next day. Upon the resumption of play at 10 o’clock in the morning, Rosewall won nine of the next 12 games.”

Because of the weather the courts were wet and slippery and were difficult to get around,” Rosewall told ATPWorldTour.com. “Rod was always extremely difficult to beat and played with great variety. I don’t think he was at his best on the slippery clay.” Rosewall, a natural left-hander who played tennis right-handed, and the possessor of an immaculate backhand slice and a fine volley, received £1,000 in prize money (approximately £16,500 in 2018) to Laver’s £500. Virginia Wade won the women’s singles title, but due to the uncertainty of the times and not wanting to immediately forgo her amateur status in case ‘open’ tennis failed, she declined her prize money after beating Winnie Shaw 6-4, 6-1 in the final.

Hardwick told reporters at the time, “We expected open tennis to be a success, but it has turned out to be a bonanza… Officially we no longer recognise players as either amateurs or professionals in Great Britain. But we realise that the public still thinks of Gonzales and Emerson as professionals, and were thrilled to see one of our Davis Cup team [Cox] conquer them. I cannot honestly say I wanted to see this happen, because I still believe the professionals are the best players in the world. That is one reason why we wanted open tournaments. But these victories by Cox are proof that the gap between contracted players and the rest is not as big as a lot of people thought.”

After the final reckoning of £12,030 in gate receipts (£206,000 in 2018), Bournemouth’s surplus for the 1968 Hard Court Champions of Great Britain amounted to “a record-breaking £3,192 (£55,000 in 2018), £2,280 (£39,000) more than the 1967 [amateurs-only] tournament,” according to Lawn Tennis magazine. But while the first ‘open’ tournament was deemed a great success, Barrett admitted to ATPWorldTour.com, ”Over the next 20 years, the sport would remain embroiled in political discord as the players continued their fight to free themselves from serfdom and govern themselves.”

If Rafael Nadal is to win his 11th Barcelona title and remain at No. 1 in the ATP Rankings, he will have earned it.

Nadal finds himself in a loaded quarter of the draw at next week’s Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell, with two-time champion Kei Nishikori looming in the third round and longtime rival Novak Djokovic potentially awaiting in the last eight. An encounter with Nishikori would be a rematch of their Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters final, set for Sunday in the Principality.

The Spaniard enters his home tournament in search of what he hopes will be the second of three 11-title milestones during the European clay-court season. He is also bidding for 11th crowns in Monte-Carlo and Roland Garros. Nadal, who has prevailed at the Trofeo Conde de Godó from 2005-09, ’11-13 and ’16-17, opens against either countryman Roberto Carballes Baena or Andreas Haider-Maurer.

Nishikori, seeded 14th, faces either Yuichi Sugita or Guillermo Garcia-Lopez to open his bid for a third tournament title. Champion in 2014-15, he enters Barcelona with great momentum at his back after reaching his fourth ATP World Tour Masters 1000 final in Monte-Carlo on Saturday.

View Draw

Djokovic, meanwhile, is in Barcelona for the first time since 2006 after being awarded a wild card on Friday. The Serbian opens against either a qualifier or Argentina’s Federico Delbonis, with Nadal or Nishikori looming large in a potential blockbuster quarter-final. He is coming off a third-round finish in Monte-Carlo, where he claimed his first match wins since January in his comeback from an elbow injury.

Also in the top half of the draw, David Goffin makes his third appearance at the ATP World Tour 500 event and is joined by Hyeon Chung and Roberto Bautista Agut as Top 10 seeds looking to make a splash. 

Other past champions at the Real Club de Tenis Barcelona include 15th seed Fernando Verdasco (2010) and wild card Tommy Robredo (2004). Last year’s runner-up Dominic Thiem is seeded third and could face Verdasco in the third round. Thiem and second seed Grigor Dimitrov, who is coming off a semi-final run in Monte-Carlo, lead the pack in the bottom half. Dimitrov opens against either Philipp Kohlschreiber or Gilles Simon, as the German and Frenchman face off for the 10th time in their FedEx ATP Head2Head series.

The Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell is another important tournament  for those battling to qualify for the Next Gen ATP Finals in Milan. Currently in fourth place, Andrey Rublev could battle Dimitrov in the third round, while seventh-placed Stefanos Tsitsipas is a potential second round opponent of Diego Schwartzman. Spanish 20-year-olds Jaume Munar and Pedro Martinez are wild card entrants.

Rafael Nadal and Kei Nishikori have been waiting for this moment for a long time.

On Sunday, the Spaniard and the Japanese will square off in the Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters final, with the prestigious tournament crowning its 112th champion. Along the pristine shores of the Mediterranean, a historic title awaits the winner in the Principality.

One year after completing ‘La Decima’ at the ATP World Tour Masters 1000 event, Nadal vies for an unprecedented 11th title at one of his clay-court playgrounds. Meanwhile, Nishikori is hoping to complete his quest for a maiden Masters 1000 crown and claim a slice of history of his own, as the first Asian-born player to lift a trophy at the level.

But, records and accolades aside, the final takes on added significance considering the state of both players’ games just a few months ago. With both on the comeback trail from injury, Nadal and Nishikori will take many positives from their stays at the Monte-Carlo Country Club. While a leg ailment had sidelined the top-seeded Spaniard for three months, since retiring from his Australian Open quarter-final, the unseeded Japanese is also bidding to return to top form after struggling with a wrist injury in 2017.

ATP World Tour Masters 1000 Title Leaders

For Nadal, his week in Monte-Carlo was so impressive, even the Spaniard himself was surprised by his ruthless run. After pulling out of three straight tournaments, in Paris and London to conclude 2017 and Melbourne in January, the Manacor native is back with a vengeance. 

Nadal extended his clay-court sets won streak to a personal-best 34 in a row following a 6-4, 6-1 rout of Grigor Dimitrov on Saturday. He has lost a mere 16 games in four matches this week, dominating Aljaz Bedene, Karen Khachanov, Dominic Thiem and the fourth-seeded Dimitrov en route to the final. It’s his fewest games dropped in Monte-Carlo since 2010, when he lost 13.

“With Kei, we had a lot of good matches in our career,” said Nadal on Saturday. “It’s going to be a tough match. I know I have to play at my best to keep having real chances of success. It is an important match for me tomorrow. But still, to be in the final already after a period outside of the courts is great news for me. Let’s try to be ready for tomorrow. Let’s try to play a great match and give me another chance.”

One loss and Nadal will concede the top spot in the ATP Rankings to Roger Federer, after returning to the summit earlier this month. But he has showed no intentions of letting his grasp on the No. 1 mantle slip on his preferred surface. And not only is Nadal bidding to lift his 11th trophy in the Principality, he is also looking to return to the summit on the ATP World Tour Masters 1000 titles list. Currently tied with Novak Djokovic with 30 crowns apiece, No. 31 would see him stand alone in first place.

On Sunday, Nadal will look to extend his FedEx ATP Head2Head advantage over Nishikori, which currently stands at 9-2. Despite falling in their most recent meeting, for the bronze medal at the 2016 Summer Olympics, he has not lost in three encounters on clay. Two of those clashes came in finals as well, at the 2014 Mutua Madrid Open and 2016 Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell.

“Tomorrow is a different opponent,” said Nishikori. “He’s been dominating like crazy this week. I know it’s going to be tough. For me, I think I’m improving every match. I feel very confident right now.

“Rafa has been hitting very, very heavy, especially his forehand. His backhand also. He’s been playing very solid this week. I’m sure there is a way to beat him. But, to see him this week, it looks little bit difficult.”

Arriving at this moment is an achievement in itself for Nishikori, who entered the week with just four wins from seven matches on the ATP World Tour this year. But, after reaching his fourth ATP World Tour Masters 1000 final and first in Monte-Carlo, the Japanese star took a massive step in the right direction in his comeback from a wrist injury. A quartet of three-set wins over Tomas Berdych, Andreas Seppi, Marin Cilic and Alexander Zverev will give Nishikori great confidence in his durability going forward.

Recent non-European Masters 1000 Champions (since 2007)

The Shimane native is eyeing a first Masters 1000 title after falling to Novak Djokovic in both the Miami and Toronto finals in 2016, and suffering a three-set defeat to Nadal in Madrid four years ago. Not only would he become the first from Japan to claim victory at the elite level, but also the first Asian-born player to achieve the feat.

Nishikori is also hoping to continue the trend for first-time Masters 1000 champions. Victory for the 28-year-old would make him the fourth straight first-time winner, following Jack Sock in Paris last year and Juan Martin del Potro and John Isner in Indian Wells and Miami last month. He is also looking to continue the streak for non-European titlists, marking the longest such run in Masters 1000 history. 

And Nishikori’s historic bid does not stop there. A win on Sunday would make him the first player to lift trophies on both the ATP Challenger Tour and at the ATP World Tour Masters 1000 level in a single season. He will have his shot at cementing his place in the record books after triumphing at the RBC Tennis Championships of Dallas in February.

The stage is set for another gripping final on the red dirt. With plenty at stake, expect nothing short of a heavyweight fight for the trophy.